A Critical Realist Approach on Autism: Ontological and Epistemological Implications for Knowledge Production in Autism Research

Abstract

The ontological status of autism has been a subject of considerable debate and philosophical approaches of it have been recent and sparse. On the one hand, from its conception, autism has been historically heavily located in the fields of psychiatry, psychology and neuroscience, which often assume access to an “objective,” neutral and infallible reality that is external to the research process and is based on the autistic person’s biology and behavioural characteristics, which can be scientifically observed and studied. On the other, proponents of the neurodiversity movement argue against medicalised and pathologising approaches to autism and toward approaches that consider social constructions of autism and relations of power. The Critical Realist philosophy can help reconcile the two positions. Critical Realism conceptualises objectivity as a statement about an object, rather than a neutral and infallible reality. Consequently, Critical Realism suggests that access to reality can only occur through fallible theories. It also suggests that effective theorising goes beyond appearances and phenomena and may even contradict them, which can help challenge dominant behaviourist approaches on autism. I then explore how the tenets of Critical Realism can help strengthen autistic-led theories of autism, the arguments they make, as well as how they support the importance of community autism knowledge. Finally, I present how Critical Realism’s approach to knowledge itself as well as the process of knowledge creation can strengthen autistic theorising, autistic participation in autism research and autistic emancipation. In the last part of the article, I explore how the concepts of Critical Realism apply to autistic sociability. I start with the debate between structure and agency, how Critical Realism reconciles this debate and the implications for autistic emancipation and autism research. I then present Critical Realism’s process of critique and explanation, how they connect to human emancipation and how they can lead to impactful change in autism research by requiring clear links from research to practice, enhancing practices with strong theoretical underpinnings and thus aiding the aims of emancipatory autism research.

‘I felt like I deserved it because I was autistic’: Understanding the impact of interpersonal victimisation in the lives of autistic people

“…We used reflexive thematic analysis to facilitate a flexible yet detailed interpretation of the data set, and a blended approach to facilitate consideration of the data in relation to Frost’s model (2011), alongside new interpretations that arose during the coding process. We drew on a critical realist framework (Bhaskar, 2010; Botha, 2021b; Kourti, 2021) in our interpretations of the data. We remained mindful that our positionality may influence our own interpretations, as an autistic team with lived experience with IPV.…”

“I’m able to function better when I know there's a beginning and an end time”: Autistic adolescents’ experiences of lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…We adopted a critical realist perspective, foregrounding meaning-making from experience, and acknowledging the role of sociocultural and temporal context in this process (Bhaskar, 2008). Critical realism links realist ontology with subjectivist epistemology, allowing for mixed-and multi-method approaches to knowledge generation and centreing the reflexivity of the researcher (Botha, 2021;Kourti, 2021). The interviews took place during an unprecedented global health emergency, during which familiar social contexts (schools, workplaces, neighbourhoods) were severely disrupted, and so the critical realist lens was especially relevant.…”

“Comforting, reassuring, and…hot”: A qualitative exploration of engaging in BDSM and Kink from the perspective of autistic adults.

“…31 Our interpretations were grounded in the assumption that whilst all autistic people have unique experiences of the world, they will also have shared experiences, based not only on a shared/similar neurotype but on how the outside world views autistic people. 32,33 We chose to use interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as our analytic framework due to the suitability of IPA towards exploring how people make sense of their own experiences, 34 and its alignment with a critical realist perspective. IPA uses the double hermeneutic, an interactive process by which both researcher and participant make meaning of the participants' experiences, 35 with the researcher considering both explicit (what is said) and latent (what is socially constructed/influenced) content of the conversation in their analysis.…”