2021
DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2021.1924759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical note on sporting supererogation

Abstract: Alfred Archer recently argued that there is good reason to think that sporting supererogation exists. In the present paper, I take a closer look at Archer's two key cases from association football and his arguments in favour of positing that there is a sporting supererogation phenomenon or realm that needs to be reckoned with. I argue that his project fails and that the notion of 'sporting supererogation' as championed by Archer should be rejected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archer & Ware (2017) use the same strategy to argue for the existence of aesthetic supererogation.4 Though seeBorge (2021) for a critical reply to this argument.5 For a more detailed discussion of this argument seeArcher (2016).6 SeeCrisp (2013) for a critical discussion of Urmson's argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archer & Ware (2017) use the same strategy to argue for the existence of aesthetic supererogation.4 Though seeBorge (2021) for a critical reply to this argument.5 For a more detailed discussion of this argument seeArcher (2016).6 SeeCrisp (2013) for a critical discussion of Urmson's argument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%