2015
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-2775-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles

Abstract: Abstract. Given significant challenges with available measurements of aerosol acidity, proxy methods are frequently used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles. In this study, four of the most common aerosol acidity proxies are evaluated and compared: (1) the ion balance method, (2) the molar ratio method, (3) thermodynamic equilibrium models, and (4) the phase partitioning of ammonia. All methods are evaluated against predictions of thermodynamic models and against direct observations of aerosol-gas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

25
370
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
25
370
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results suggest that the reverse mode calculations (only using aerosol quantity as model inputs) are strongly affected by the ion balance and hence the ionic measurement errors are very likely to lead to unreliable estimates of particle pH (Murphy et al, 2017;Hennigan et al, 2015). Furthermore, an equivalent ratio of near unity may not indicate that fine particles of winter haze have a pH of around 7 or close to 7 Cheng et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2017).…”
Section: Reverse Mode Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The above results suggest that the reverse mode calculations (only using aerosol quantity as model inputs) are strongly affected by the ion balance and hence the ionic measurement errors are very likely to lead to unreliable estimates of particle pH (Murphy et al, 2017;Hennigan et al, 2015). Furthermore, an equivalent ratio of near unity may not indicate that fine particles of winter haze have a pH of around 7 or close to 7 Cheng et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2017).…”
Section: Reverse Mode Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The samples with negative ion balance (cations < anions) usually project pH values below 2 (highly acidic), whereas those with positive ion balance (cations > anions) are identified with pH values above 7.4 (neutral or basic). These features have been demonstrated also by Hennigan et al (2015) and Murphy et al (2017) using different observational datasets. Since 25 the inputs to reverse mode calculations include only aerosol phase measurements of ions, the predicted pH values depend largely on the ion balance (Hennigan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Overview Of Measurements and Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations