2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical discourse analysis of New Zealand government policy: Women as mothers and workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Austrian Society for Critical Psychology has taken on the role of a professional organization that represents psychologists' interests, pro vides continuing education, and promotes the discussion of critical-psychological and health-psychological topics to its members.1 Although Europe has seen a slow shift from Germany to the United Kingdom in the last two decades in terms of leadership in CP, one can easily locate the accom plishments of critical approaches in smaller countries such as Denmark, which has developed its own versions of CP (Axel, 2009;Dreier, 2007;Nissen, 2008). CP has also a significant presence in Oceania (Hodgetts & Chamberlain, 2006;Kahu & Morgan, 2007), South Africa (Painter & Blanche, 2004), and Latin America (Montero & Christlieb, 2003); in fact, self-identifying critical psychologists come from all continents.2 National, international, and North American conferences on CP have been organized by fac ulty or students, and there exist, admittedly, shifting pro grams in which students can receive advanced degrees in CP (e.g., a critical social/personality psychology doctoral program at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Austrian Society for Critical Psychology has taken on the role of a professional organization that represents psychologists' interests, pro vides continuing education, and promotes the discussion of critical-psychological and health-psychological topics to its members.1 Although Europe has seen a slow shift from Germany to the United Kingdom in the last two decades in terms of leadership in CP, one can easily locate the accom plishments of critical approaches in smaller countries such as Denmark, which has developed its own versions of CP (Axel, 2009;Dreier, 2007;Nissen, 2008). CP has also a significant presence in Oceania (Hodgetts & Chamberlain, 2006;Kahu & Morgan, 2007), South Africa (Painter & Blanche, 2004), and Latin America (Montero & Christlieb, 2003); in fact, self-identifying critical psychologists come from all continents.2 National, international, and North American conferences on CP have been organized by fac ulty or students, and there exist, admittedly, shifting pro grams in which students can receive advanced degrees in CP (e.g., a critical social/personality psychology doctoral program at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein women's roles and participation become substandard and devalued. A research by Kahu and Morgan (2007) validates this circumstance through their findings in New Zealand. When viewed through the feminist rhetorical perspective, they found that policy documents were designed primarily to achieve economic objectives rather than the needs of women.…”
Section: The Feminist Perspective: a Policy For Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The relationship between discourse and wider society is often marked by opacity, 'suggesting that such linkages between discourse, ideology and power may well be unclear to those involved, and more generally that our social practice is bound up with causes and effects which may not be at all apparent' (Fairclough 1995: 133). Discourse analysis aims to reveal the power of discursive strategies to constitute, maintain, reproduce, or transform identities and power relations socially (Hastings 1999;Kahu 2007), and is arguably most effective when integrated with other social research methods (Marston 2002). Accordingly, data collection involved both qualitative semi-structured interviews with government trade and immigration officials, corporate employees and entrepreneurs involved in trade promotion between India and Canada, as well as assessment of published data and documents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%