2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical comparison of smooth and sharp interface methods for phase transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This test case has been simulated by Tanguy et al [85] on two-dimensional axisymmetric cartesian grids and by Rajkotwala et al [67] on three-dimensional cartesian grids. Our goal is to reproduce similar results in order to validate our numerical method on three-dimensional unstructured grids.…”
Section: Numerical Results In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This test case has been simulated by Tanguy et al [85] on two-dimensional axisymmetric cartesian grids and by Rajkotwala et al [67] on three-dimensional cartesian grids. Our goal is to reproduce similar results in order to validate our numerical method on three-dimensional unstructured grids.…”
Section: Numerical Results In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this purpose, DNS of nucleate boiling are proposed in which the heat conduction in the solid wall is taken into account. Also in 2019, Rajkotwala et al [67] provided a comparison of smooth and sharp interface methods for numerical simulations of two-phase flows with phase change. The authors used a hybrid front tracking method without connectivity, which can easily handle complex topological changes.…”
Section: Coupling Between Level Set and Ghost Fluid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches are possible [44] for capturing mass transfer at a fluid interface. For the case of evaporation mass transfer typical of boiling flows, essentially two classes of approaches have been developed, used in conjunction with various interface capturing techniques, as summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Modelling Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFRM can easily handle complex topological changes like droplet collisions and merging and can accurately capture the interface dynamics while using relatively coarse grids compared to front capturing methods 23 . We have extended the LFRM to include phase transition using a sharp interface approach for the energy equation 24 . The extended method has been verified against analytical solutions for standard 1D and 3D tests and validated against experimental data for 3D bubble rise and growth in a supersaturated liquid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%