2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient-enhanced softening continua

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
408
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 565 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
408
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last important problem arises from the well known loss of ellipticity of the damage problem. Developing a model that overcomes localization problems, such as those carried out by Kuhl and Ramm (1999), Steinmann (1999), Peerlings et al (2001) or Peña (2011) will subject for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last important problem arises from the well known loss of ellipticity of the damage problem. Developing a model that overcomes localization problems, such as those carried out by Kuhl and Ramm (1999), Steinmann (1999), Peerlings et al (2001) or Peña (2011) will subject for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In implicit gradient models [5] the nonlocal state variable Y is the solution of a partial differential equation with the local state variable Y as the source term. Various studies [18,17] show that the second-order implicit gradient enhancement provides the best approximation to the integral-type nonlocal model. For this reason, we have chosen this particular gradient approach to facilitate our comparative analysis.…”
Section: Gradient Nonlocal Damage Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques to overcome this drawback have been developed and published in the literature. Peerlings et al [4] compare the different averaging techniques with different weight functions with the gradient enhance method. In the present work, the simplest method has been chosen: The parameters for damage evolution have simple been optimized for mesh sizes between 5-10 mm.…”
Section: Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%