2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(03)00151-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical comparison between the wave model and the standard dispersion model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the wave (relaxation) model and diffusion model of longitudinal dispersion accompanied by chemical reaction was discussed by Moshinskii ( Moshinskii, 2003 ). Also Iordanidis et al ( Iordanidis et al, 2003 ) critically compared the wave model and the standard dispersion model for various exothermic reactions and concluded that the main difference is in the description of energy transport; discrepancies are more significant for fast processes with steep temperature and concentration profiles along the reactor.…”
Section: Shortcoming Of Standard Dispersion Model (Sdm) and The Wave mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the wave (relaxation) model and diffusion model of longitudinal dispersion accompanied by chemical reaction was discussed by Moshinskii ( Moshinskii, 2003 ). Also Iordanidis et al ( Iordanidis et al, 2003 ) critically compared the wave model and the standard dispersion model for various exothermic reactions and concluded that the main difference is in the description of energy transport; discrepancies are more significant for fast processes with steep temperature and concentration profiles along the reactor.…”
Section: Shortcoming Of Standard Dispersion Model (Sdm) and The Wave mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some different approaches to this problem have included the cross-flow model, 24 the alternating flow model, 25 and the wave model, first put forward by Stewart 26 and more recently strongly championed by Kronberg and his colleagues. 27,28 The application of the wave model to fixed bed heat transfer was demonstrated by Kronberg and Westerterp 27 whose work showed that this model also results in parameters that must be determined from experimental data.…”
Section: Background To Velocity-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with the problems associated with heat transfer modeling in packed tubes, several authors have expressed dissatisfaction with the standard dispersion model (SDM) which uses effective diffusion to represent axial and radial dispersion and has drawbacks including infinite speed of propagation and overestimation of back-mixing. Some different approaches to this problem have included the cross-flow model, the alternating flow model, and the wave model, first put forward by Stewart and more recently strongly championed by Kronberg and his colleagues. , The application of the wave model to fixed bed heat transfer was demonstrated by Kronberg and Westerterp whose work showed that this model also results in parameters that must be determined from experimental data.…”
Section: Background To Velocity-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic equations used for this work are valid in a temperature range from 250°C to 400°C, an interval compatible with the reaction temperatures. Where as a general formulation: …”
Section: Feed Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%