2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, pedestrians naturally adapt to their surroundings [16]. The mean accepted gap for pedestrian to make a cross is estimated to be 8 seconds [17].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, pedestrians naturally adapt to their surroundings [16]. The mean accepted gap for pedestrian to make a cross is estimated to be 8 seconds [17].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gaps are often described by estimating the means of liner regression modeling or by probability distributions. Indicatively, it can be declared that the minimum accepted gap has been estimated to be 2 seconds while the mean accepted gap has been estimated to be 8 seconds [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most models focus specifically on crowd or evacuation dynamics and not so much on modelling entire trips of pedestrians in regular traffic in public spaces. Despite advances in modelling techniques towards sophisticated ABMs, they still have challenges in reproducing real world behaviours reliably in all situations (Castle and Crooks, 2006;Crooks et al, 2008;Papadimitriou et al, 2009). A main reason for that collectively mentioned in the literature is that there exist few empirical studies and verified standard HSD datasets from recordings of real life pedestrian and bicycle traffic to calibrate the models against.…”
Section: Mapping and Modelling Human Movement And Behaviour In Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In transportation science, quantitative assessment was done to analyze the effects of physical settings on transportation routes and time (Braess et al, 2005;Jin et al, 2008;Papadimitriou et al, 2009;Stepanov and Smith, 2009). Service has also been a research topic for quantitative evaluation, but previous analyses have been limited to the concept of service process and its productivity (Gronroos and Ojasalo, 2004).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluations On Service Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%