2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical assessment of data quality and venous effects in sub-millimeter fMRI

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
158
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
10
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Kashyap et al, 2018)). This can result in additional fMRI signal changes in the GM voxels in close proximity to PVs (see, for example, recent reports of (Kay et al, 2019;Moerel et al, 2018)). Although we model dHb and CBV changes in extra-and intra-vascular compartments of PVs, the contribution of the blooming effect to the laminar BOLD signal is not accounted for in the proposed model.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kashyap et al, 2018)). This can result in additional fMRI signal changes in the GM voxels in close proximity to PVs (see, for example, recent reports of (Kay et al, 2019;Moerel et al, 2018)). Although we model dHb and CBV changes in extra-and intra-vascular compartments of PVs, the contribution of the blooming effect to the laminar BOLD signal is not accounted for in the proposed model.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, despite the advances afforded by UHF imaging, GE-EPI remains limited by vasculature contribution to BOLD signals at the cortical surface resulting in loss of spatial 34 specificity (Kay et al, 2019). Here, we combined several approaches to reduce this superficial bias by removing voxels with high temporal signal to noise ratio (Olman et al, 2007) and high t-statistic for stimulation contrast (Kashyap et al, 2018;Polimeni et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three approaches were combined to reduce the influence from large pial veins. First, vertices with low EPI intensity from the mean EPI image were removed (Kay, Jamison et al 2019) . The mean EPI image was first bias-corrected to remove non-uniformity of signal intensity (3dUnifize in AFNI), then vertices with an intensity below 75% of the mean intensity of all surface vertices were excluded.…”
Section: Roi Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%