2023
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01667-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical appraisal of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy in a Western European level 1 trauma centre: a 13-year experience

Ennio Alberto Adami,
Gaetano Poillucci,
Salomone Di Saverio
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A skill increasingly applied for several diagnostic questions and also (re-)evaluation after therapeutic interventions is POCUS, both in and outside the hospital [61][62][63]. Several protocols have been developed to apply POCUS systematically in critical trauma patients including TCA, e.g., a modified FATE-, RUSH-, or eFAST protocol [64,65]. Performed systematically, POCUS will detect major reversible causes of TCA, e.g., hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax, or cardiac tamponade, and prompt respective interventions, such as a resuscitative thoracotomy.…”
Section: Cardiac Electrotrauma-induced Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A skill increasingly applied for several diagnostic questions and also (re-)evaluation after therapeutic interventions is POCUS, both in and outside the hospital [61][62][63]. Several protocols have been developed to apply POCUS systematically in critical trauma patients including TCA, e.g., a modified FATE-, RUSH-, or eFAST protocol [64,65]. Performed systematically, POCUS will detect major reversible causes of TCA, e.g., hypovolemia, tension pneumothorax, or cardiac tamponade, and prompt respective interventions, such as a resuscitative thoracotomy.…”
Section: Cardiac Electrotrauma-induced Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ERT can be lifesaving, its effectiveness and survival rates fluctuate, as evidenced by rates ranging from 0% to 56.8%, 2 due to factors such as small study sizes, unclear inclusion criteria, and varied study quality, making comprehensive outcome assessment challenging. 3 , 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%