2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4285-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical appraisal and evaluation of modern PDFs

Abstract: We review the present status of the determination of parton distribution functions (PDFs) in the light of the precision requirements for the LHC in Run 2 and other future hadron colliders. We provide brief reviews of all currently available PDF sets and use them to compute cross sections for a number of benchmark processes, including Higgs boson production in gluon-gluon fusion at the LHC. We show that the differences in the predictions obtained with the various PDFs are due to particular theory assumptions ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
145
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 348 publications
(794 reference statements)
5
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the present time several groups determine PDFs (for latest results see, e.g. [1,[236][237][238][239][240][241], and for a recent review see [242,243]). In Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time several groups determine PDFs (for latest results see, e.g. [1,[236][237][238][239][240][241], and for a recent review see [242,243]). In Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDFs collaborations constantly improve their fitting in order to reduce this error, by including high precision data from HERA and Fermilab [1,2]. In the large-x regime PDFs uncertainties have been sensibly reduced, allowing precise predictions at higher energy scales where we expect new physics to appear.…”
Section: The Lhc As Photon Collidermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these differences have been addressed by benchmark exercises to assess the true differences in the methodologies of the groups [20,21]. The level of precision for these benchmarked PDFs (based on General-Mass-Variable-Flavour-Number-Schemes) reaches below 10% in the bulk x region of 10 −3 − 10 −1 , however, outside this region, the level of uncertainties escalate considerably, as shown in figure 3 for the gluon distribution.…”
Section: Current Pdf Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%