2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings in Study III are specific to Sweden and cannot be generalized. However, the results may still be of interest outside Sweden as the views and perceptions of waterbirth also are debated in other countries (92,179,180).…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The findings in Study III are specific to Sweden and cannot be generalized. However, the results may still be of interest outside Sweden as the views and perceptions of waterbirth also are debated in other countries (92,179,180).…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although waterbirth is available in every state and territory in Australia, currently WA and South Australia (SA) are the only states with state-wide policies and guidance supporting immersion in water for labour and birth, although there are at least 25 Australian water immersion policies. 2 Additionally, no national body collects waterbirth data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason obstetricians do not support the option of labouring and giving birth in water might be that observational studies in the literature report only the benefits and risks of water immersion but do not capture the experiences of women 17 to better inform the medical practitioners. It has also been reported that due to little high-quality research on the safety and practicality of water immersion, policies and guidelines informing the practice may lack the evidence necessary to ensure practitioner confidence with this option, thereby limiting both accessibility and women's autonomy 43,44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study highlights the lack of support from obstetricians for the water immersion birthing option in Greece. This lack of support could be attributed to the lack of knowledge and skills on labouring and giving birth in water, to paternalism that has been reported to prevail in hospital environments 41,42 , and to the lack of high quality evidence to inform clinical practice on water births 43,44 . It has been reported that water birth workshops have the potential to significantly enhance the adoption of the midwifery model of care that pursues normality even within a medically dominated hospital birthing environment 47 , such as that in Greek maternity hospitals.…”
Section: Areas For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%