A CRITIC-TOPSIS MCDM Technique under the Neutrosophic Environment with Application on Aircraft Selection
Gurpreet Kaur,
Aishwarya Dhara,
Arunava Majumder
et al.
Abstract:This paper develops a CRITIC-TOPSIS ''multi-criteria decision-making'' method under a neutrosophic environment. The neutrosophic set is a generalized version of the fuzzy and ''intuitionistic fuzzy set''. The purpose of this paper is the extension of the CRITIC-TOPSIS method using neutrosophic sets to create a more accurate and efficient decision support system for selecting a very light business jet (Bizjet). It provides the ranking to the selected number of Bizjets based on some pre-defined criteria under th… Show more
“…The literature review includes a wide range of studies that use the CRITIC technique on a variety of topics. Kaur et al [35] present a CRITIC-TOPSIS MCDM technique for selecting aeroplanes in a neutrosophic environment. Sleem et al [36] use a neutrosophic CRITIC MCDM approach to extend the application to the virtual reality metaverse.…”
This investigation delves into the critical challenges of urban development and management, employing a comprehensive evaluation of four strategic alternatives: transit-oriented development, green infrastructure investment, smart city technologies, and community-based development. These alternatives are rigorously assessed against a set of eight meticulously chosen criteria. Distinct from conventional analyses, the study adopts the sophisticated Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methodology, utilizing spherical fuzzy sets (SFS). This approach mitigates uncertainties inherent in decision-making processes, thereby refining the accuracy of the evaluation. The CRITIC-WASPAS method, with its innovative application in this context, augments the precision of the assessments, yielding a detailed appraisal of each alternative's merits and limitations. Through assigning weighted criteria and systematically ranking these alternatives, the study furnishes pivotal insights for urban planners and policymakers. This contribution is instrumental in guiding decisions that promote resilience, equity, and environmental sustainability in urban environments. The novel integration of the CRITIC-WASPAS method in this domain not only propels the field forward but also lays a robust foundation for informed and effective decision-making. The outcomes of this research are poised to significantly impact the discourse on sustainable urban development, offering a data-driven framework that is essential for sculpting the future of cities amidst evolving urban challenges.
“…The literature review includes a wide range of studies that use the CRITIC technique on a variety of topics. Kaur et al [35] present a CRITIC-TOPSIS MCDM technique for selecting aeroplanes in a neutrosophic environment. Sleem et al [36] use a neutrosophic CRITIC MCDM approach to extend the application to the virtual reality metaverse.…”
This investigation delves into the critical challenges of urban development and management, employing a comprehensive evaluation of four strategic alternatives: transit-oriented development, green infrastructure investment, smart city technologies, and community-based development. These alternatives are rigorously assessed against a set of eight meticulously chosen criteria. Distinct from conventional analyses, the study adopts the sophisticated Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC)-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methodology, utilizing spherical fuzzy sets (SFS). This approach mitigates uncertainties inherent in decision-making processes, thereby refining the accuracy of the evaluation. The CRITIC-WASPAS method, with its innovative application in this context, augments the precision of the assessments, yielding a detailed appraisal of each alternative's merits and limitations. Through assigning weighted criteria and systematically ranking these alternatives, the study furnishes pivotal insights for urban planners and policymakers. This contribution is instrumental in guiding decisions that promote resilience, equity, and environmental sustainability in urban environments. The novel integration of the CRITIC-WASPAS method in this domain not only propels the field forward but also lays a robust foundation for informed and effective decision-making. The outcomes of this research are poised to significantly impact the discourse on sustainable urban development, offering a data-driven framework that is essential for sculpting the future of cities amidst evolving urban challenges.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.