2020
DOI: 10.1002/cem.3227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A criterion for automatic image deconvolution with L0‐norm regularization

Abstract: Automatic penalty adjustment in sparse deconvolution with penalized least squares is required for improved reliability and broader applicability. In sparse deconvolution with an L0‐norm penalty, the latent signal is by nature discontinuous, and the magnitudes of the residuals and sparsity regularization terms are of different order of magnitude. This makes approaches such as generalized cross validation or L‐curve unsuitable in practice. The criterion proposed in this paper is based on the representation of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although motivated by demands of spatio-temporal imaging, the proposed formulation addressed only frame-by-frame deconvolution, i.e., the resulting algorithm was to be applied independently to each frame. While this is common to most image restoration methods (both deep learning and conventional approaches), recent work illustrated the benefits of taking the spatio- temporal nature of the acquired data into account [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although motivated by demands of spatio-temporal imaging, the proposed formulation addressed only frame-by-frame deconvolution, i.e., the resulting algorithm was to be applied independently to each frame. While this is common to most image restoration methods (both deep learning and conventional approaches), recent work illustrated the benefits of taking the spatio- temporal nature of the acquired data into account [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the resulting algorithm was to be applied independently to each frame. While this is common to most image restoration methods (both deep learning and conventional approaches), recent work illustrated benefits of taking into account the spatio-temporal nature of the acquired data [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%