2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A criterial analysis of the effectiveness of air-to-air heat exchangers with periodic change of airflow direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, for the double-core exchanger developed by Tempeff (Tempeff North America 2020), the supply side sensors are exposed to a sawtooth profile while those on the exhaust side experience semi-sawtooth profile. For the single-core exchanger or room-based energy recovery exchanger (ventilator) (Borodulin and Nizovtsev 2018), as shown in Table 1, the sensors at the FBR supply and exhaust sides are exposed to a semi-sawtooth profile that is labeled exchanger sensor in Table 1.…”
Section: Fbr Configurations and Outlet Property Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, for the double-core exchanger developed by Tempeff (Tempeff North America 2020), the supply side sensors are exposed to a sawtooth profile while those on the exhaust side experience semi-sawtooth profile. For the single-core exchanger or room-based energy recovery exchanger (ventilator) (Borodulin and Nizovtsev 2018), as shown in Table 1, the sensors at the FBR supply and exhaust sides are exposed to a semi-sawtooth profile that is labeled exchanger sensor in Table 1.…”
Section: Fbr Configurations and Outlet Property Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of AAEEs are available in the market, including fixed-plate exchangers, heat pipes, energy/heat wheels, fixed-bed regenerators (FBRs), and runaround membrane exchangers (ASHRAE 2012;Diao et al 2014;Wemhoener et al 2016;Lowenstein 2008;Fan et al 2006). Among these AAEEs, FBRs are gaining more interest nowadays for energy recovery in HVAC applications (Borodulin and Nizovtsev 2018;Nizovtsev et al 2016;Chang, Liang, and Chen 2018;Cerrah, McCague, and Bahrami 2020;Ramin, Krishnan, and Simonson 2019;), due to their high ratio of energy transfer area to volume, which leads to high effectiveness. In the literature, they are widely referred to as single-core regenerators, double-core regenerators (CSA Group 2018), room-based ventilators (Nizovtsev et al 2016;Aristov, Mezentsev, and Mukhin 2006), reversing-flow regenerators (CSA Group 2018), and exchangers with a periodic change in the flow direction (Chang, Liang, and Chen 2018;Chang et al 2013;2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy wheels have been extensively studied for energy recovery in HVAC applications [2,[5][6][7][8][9], and FBRs have been used for heat recovery in high-temperature applications such as glass furnaces, coke ovens, and open-hearth steel furnaces [10][11][12][13]. In recent times, FBRs have been attracting increasing attention for energy recovery in HVAC applications due to their high effectiveness [1,[14][15][16][17][18]. Typical heating and cooling periods of FBRs are about 20 minutes for glass furnace applications [12,13], whereas, in the HVAC industry, a shorter period duration of 15-120 seconds is required [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krishnan et al [20] reported significant deviations in the experimental determination of the effectiveness of FBRs due to sensor transient, especially at the shorter operating cycles (15 seconds). In recent studies of FBRs for HVAC applications [1,16,18], the mathematical models have been used to predict the effectiveness, but the initial 2 Numerical model for the FBR and temperature sensor…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%