2003
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2003.818537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A credit assignment approach to fusing classifiers of multiseason hyperspectral imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By fusing slightly different observations of the same spatial scene -each of which generates a slightly differen spatial patternswe follow a similar approach. As pointed out earlier, e.g., by Bachman et al: "In remote sensing applications, variance reduction also can be achieved by using multisensor or multi-temporal data to produce a pool of classifiers with decorrelated error distributions" [50]. However, while some recommend very generally to pool predictions [51] and that "inaccurate classifiers should not be excluded .…”
Section: Multitemporal Fusion and Bias-variance Tradeoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fusing slightly different observations of the same spatial scene -each of which generates a slightly differen spatial patternswe follow a similar approach. As pointed out earlier, e.g., by Bachman et al: "In remote sensing applications, variance reduction also can be achieved by using multisensor or multi-temporal data to produce a pool of classifiers with decorrelated error distributions" [50]. However, while some recommend very generally to pool predictions [51] and that "inaccurate classifiers should not be excluded .…”
Section: Multitemporal Fusion and Bias-variance Tradeoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding an extra element to the representation which indicates the value of K at which curvature onset occurs, using our adaptive K estimation procedure, will have the effect of sub-dividing the manifold into sets of varying degree of curvature ( Figure 5). We demonstrate this approach for the problem of scene anomaly finding using PROBE airborne HSI data of Smith Island, VA, originally described in [6] [7]. Scene anomalies, in manifold representation or in the new submanifold derivations, tend to project off of the background data distribution (Figure 4).…”
Section: Re-examining Data Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate ARESEPE, we have chosen a set of airborne hyperspectral data drawn from a larger scale study described in [2] and [3]. In particular, we evaluate land-cover classification models derived from a PROBE2 scene acquired on October 18, 2001 of Smith Island, VA, a barrier island in The Nature Conservancy's Virginia Coast Reserve (VCR).…”
Section: Example: Probe2 Airborne Hyperspectral Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we evaluate land-cover classification models derived from a PROBE2 scene acquired on October 18, 2001 of Smith Island, VA, a barrier island in The Nature Conservancy's Virginia Coast Reserve (VCR). 1 Land-cover modeling using a HyMAP scene of this island from May 2000 was described in [2], while [3] addresses multiseason models that have been derived for this island and which show improvement over single-season models, including the set used for illustration in this paper. The database of labeled spectral samples was divided into a Training Set (3632 samples), a Cross-Validation Test Set (1971 samples) used to determine the best model during the optimization, and a Sequestered Test Set (2834 samples) that served as an independent test of generalization capability.…”
Section: Example: Probe2 Airborne Hyperspectral Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%