Abstract:The hypothesis of a common origin for high-order memory centers in bilateral animals presents the question of how different brain structures, such as the vertebrate hippocampus and the arthropod mushroom bodies, are both structurally and functionally comparable. Obtaining evidence to support the hypothesis that crustaceans possess structures equivalent to the mushroom bodies that play a role in associative memories has proved challenging. Structural evidence supports that the hemiellipsoid bodies of hermit cra… Show more
“…Reniform bodies and mushroom bodies are each defined by their own distinctive set of morphological traits (Table 1), those of reniform bodies identified from observations of Stomatopoda and the crab Hemigrapsus nudus (Thoen et al, 2020). Some of those traits are indeed recognized by Maza et al (2020) but interpreted as belonging to an insect‐like mushroom body. Invariant features of the reniform body morphology that might be mistaken for mushroom body traits include a dense group of quite small perikarya, numbering in the hundreds, situated on the dorsal surface of the lateral protocerebrum.…”
Section: The Reniform Body Does Not Correspond To the Canonical Mushroom Bodymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Confidence in this yardstick makes it possible to recognize even radical departures from the ground pattern and to detect possible misidentifications (Strausfeld & Sayre, 2021). A recent example of misidentification is exemplified by two papers claiming that in a species of Brachyura (crabs) the reniform body, as recognized in Stomatopoda, is homologous to the insect mushroom body (see, Maza et al, 2020; Maza, Sztarker, et al, 2016).…”
In one species of shore crab (Brachyura, Varunidae), a center that supports long‐term visual habituation and that matches the reniform body's morphology has been claimed as a homolog of the insect mushroom body despite lacking traits that define it as such. The discovery in a related species of shore crab of a mushroom body possessing those defining traits renders that interpretation unsound. Two phenotypically distinct, coexisting centers cannot both be homologs of the insect mushroom body. The present commentary outlines the history of research leading to misidentification of the reniform body as a mushroom body. One conclusion is that if both centers support learning and memory, this would be viewed as a novel and fascinating attribute of the pancrustacean brain.
“…Reniform bodies and mushroom bodies are each defined by their own distinctive set of morphological traits (Table 1), those of reniform bodies identified from observations of Stomatopoda and the crab Hemigrapsus nudus (Thoen et al, 2020). Some of those traits are indeed recognized by Maza et al (2020) but interpreted as belonging to an insect‐like mushroom body. Invariant features of the reniform body morphology that might be mistaken for mushroom body traits include a dense group of quite small perikarya, numbering in the hundreds, situated on the dorsal surface of the lateral protocerebrum.…”
Section: The Reniform Body Does Not Correspond To the Canonical Mushroom Bodymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Confidence in this yardstick makes it possible to recognize even radical departures from the ground pattern and to detect possible misidentifications (Strausfeld & Sayre, 2021). A recent example of misidentification is exemplified by two papers claiming that in a species of Brachyura (crabs) the reniform body, as recognized in Stomatopoda, is homologous to the insect mushroom body (see, Maza et al, 2020; Maza, Sztarker, et al, 2016).…”
In one species of shore crab (Brachyura, Varunidae), a center that supports long‐term visual habituation and that matches the reniform body's morphology has been claimed as a homolog of the insect mushroom body despite lacking traits that define it as such. The discovery in a related species of shore crab of a mushroom body possessing those defining traits renders that interpretation unsound. Two phenotypically distinct, coexisting centers cannot both be homologs of the insect mushroom body. The present commentary outlines the history of research leading to misidentification of the reniform body as a mushroom body. One conclusion is that if both centers support learning and memory, this would be viewed as a novel and fascinating attribute of the pancrustacean brain.
“…As demonstrated previously and again here, large DC0-positive domains cover much of the varunid lateral protocerebrum, suggesting relatively enormous (for an arthropod) learning and memory neuropils (Strausfeld et al, 2020). The proposition that the reniform body is the crab’s mushroom body (Maza et al, 2016, 2020) is refuted by Golgi impregnations and 3-D reconstructions of the lateral protocerebrum demonstrating the reniform body as entirely distinct from the huge DC0-positive mushroom body adjacent to it ( Figure 11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, identifying a mushroom body homologue in the crab's brain has been problematic. Claims for homologous centers range from paired neuropils in the brain's second segment, the deutocerebrum, later attributed to the olfactory system (Bethe 1897), to an insistence that the crab's reniform body is a mushroom body (Maza et al, 2016(Maza et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, identifying a mushroom body homologue in the crab’s brain has been problematic. Claims for homologous centers range from paired neuropils in the brain’s second segment, the deutocerebrum, later attributed to the olfactory system (Bethe 1897), to an insistence that the crab’s reniform body is a mushroom body (Maza et al, 2016, 2020). Demonstrated 132 years ago in stomatopod crustaceans, the reniform body is a morphologically distinct center that coexists in the brain’s lateral protocerebrum adjacent to its columnar mushroom bodies (Bellonci, 1882; Thoen et al, 2019).…”
Neural organization of mushroom bodies (MBs) is largely consistent across insects, whereas across malacostracan crustaceans the ancestral ground pattern diverges broadly, resulting in successive loss of lobes and acquisition of domed MBs retaining ancestral Hebbian networks and aminergic connections. We demonstrate here a radical departure from this evolutionary trend in the recent malacostracan lineage Brachyura. In the shore crab, Hemigrapsus nudus, MBs are entirely inverted. Instead of their expected location at the brain rostral surface, inverted calyces are buried deep within it, extending columns lobes outwards to an expansive system of cortex-like gyri. This elaborate ensemble is DC0-immunoreactive, indicating extensive circuits for cognition. Mushroom body inversion and association with overlying gyri is an evolutionary novelty comparable to transposition of mammalian hippocampus to a location beneath multistratified cortices. We propose the unique MB of the brachyuran and its associated gyriform centers have enabled its successful exploitation of topographically challenging habitats in water and on land.
Mushroom bodies are known from annelids and arthropods and were formerly assumed to argue for a close relationship of these two taxa. Since molecular phylogenies univocally show that both taxa belong to two different clades in the bilaterian tree, similarity must either result from convergent evolution or from transformation of an ancestral mushroom body. Any morphological differences in the ultrastructure and composition of mushroom bodies could thus indicate convergent evolution that results from similar functional constraints. We here study the ultrastructure of the mushroom bodies, the glomerular neuropil, glia-cells and the general anatomy of the nervous system in Sthenelais boa. The neuropil of the mushroom bodies is composed of densely packed, small diameter neurites that lack individual or clusterwise glia enwrapping. Neurites of other regions of the brain are much more prominent, are enwrapped by glia-cell processes and thus can be discriminated from the neuropil of the mushroom bodies. The same applies to the respective neuronal somata. The glomerular neuropil of insects and annelids is a region of higher synaptic activity that result in a spheroid appearance of these structures. However, while these structures are sharply delimited from the surrounding neuropil of the brain by glia enwrapping in insects, this is not the case in Sthenelais boa. Although superficially similar, there are anatomical differences in the arrangement of glia-cells in the mushroom bodies and the glomerular neuropil between insects and annelids. Hence, we suppose that the observed differences rather evolved convergently to solve similar functional constrains than by transforming an ancestral mushroom body design.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.