2022
DOI: 10.26522/ssj.v16i1.2691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A COVID-19 State of Exception and the Bordering of Canada’s Immigration System: Assessing the Uneven Impacts on Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrant Workers

Abstract: Responses to COVID-19 have been characterized by rapid border closures that have transformed the pandemic from a crisis of health to a crisis of mobility. While Canada was quick to implement border restrictions for non-citizens like refugees and asylum seekers, exemptions were made for some migrant groups like temporary workers. The pandemic marked a departure from who is considered worthy of admission to Canada. In fact, the border through restricted and securitized measures has filtered desirable versus non-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This necessitates further investigation regarding the bureaucratic and navigational barriers that are faced by migrant workers and that are perhaps more easily made invisible within national contexts that espouse a comprehensive welfare system [31]. These systemic barriers to social inclusion have also been documented in countries of the global north, including Canada, the United States, and Europe [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessitates further investigation regarding the bureaucratic and navigational barriers that are faced by migrant workers and that are perhaps more easily made invisible within national contexts that espouse a comprehensive welfare system [31]. These systemic barriers to social inclusion have also been documented in countries of the global north, including Canada, the United States, and Europe [32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common COVID-19 public health measures discussed in the papers included in the scoping review [ 13 ] were social and fiscal measures [ 17 , 21 , 25 27 , 29 , 30 ] to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) that include stay-at-home instructions, physical distancing [ 17 21 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 ], and COVID-19 testing [ 19 , 24 26 ]. Control measures such as lockdowns [ 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 27 ] and pharmaceutical interventions (e.g., vaccines) [ 20 , 25 , 29 ] were also addressed.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their pandemic impact typology, Katikireddi et al (2021) propose that these inequalities produced impact ‘pathways’ which include initial exposure to the coronavirus, vulnerability to infection/disease, its social and economic consequences, effectiveness of pandemic control measures, and the adverse consequences of control measures. Along all these pathways, migrants working in other countries or away from home in their own countries have proven to be the most vulnerable and negatively affected (Abu Alrob & Shields, 2022; Freier & Vera Espinoza, 2021; Jesline et al, 2021; Mengesha et al, 2022; Mukumbang et al, 2020; Quandt et al, 2021; Ramachandran et al, 2022).…”
Section: Internal Migration Hukou and Covid‐19mentioning
confidence: 99%