Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006318803470354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Course Recommender System based on Graduating Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analysis, it can then be observed that RSs take into account user preferences when making suggestions based on recommendations from similar users, while [21,30,35,45,53] make recommendations based on learning style, and [24,31,46,50,61,64] based on diagnosis/student progress and the knowledge group. Likewise, another element they take into account are user skills and/or competences [40,42,56,69] and competences related to work associated with their profile within Internet job search portals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis, it can then be observed that RSs take into account user preferences when making suggestions based on recommendations from similar users, while [21,30,35,45,53] make recommendations based on learning style, and [24,31,46,50,61,64] based on diagnosis/student progress and the knowledge group. Likewise, another element they take into account are user skills and/or competences [40,42,56,69] and competences related to work associated with their profile within Internet job search portals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFRS-based course RS used different techniques to recommend courses to students such as; nearest neighbor and MF user-based CF to predict top-n courses for students [131], topic models to partition users based on demographic profiles, student interests and recommend courses based on the cluster [132] and recommending courses by calculating course score distribution of the most similar senior students [133]. Furthermore, one study results showed that better performance can be obtained from K-nearest neighbor by selecting neighborhood between 10 to 15 students [134].…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering-based Recommendation System (Cfrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bozyigit et al [16] Cold-start problem is overcome by taking Weighted Averaging of most recent grades of the courses taken by the students Bakhshinategh et al [134] The results showed that better performance can be obtained by selecting the number of users in the neighborhood for K-nearest neighbor between 10 to 15 students Huang et al [133] Novel cross-user-domain CF by using course-score distribution of the most similar senior students, scalability issues is addressed by selecting the top t optional courses with the highest predicted scores. Extensive testing has been conducted.…”
Section: Collaborative Filtering-based Recommendation System (Cfrs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural Network and association rules were applied in [17], but in study [18] only the association rule was applied. Otherwise [19], researchers used the correlation threshold and nearest neighbor approach. [20] proposed a system recommending optional courses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%