“…Specifically, researchers (e.g., Byrd, 2001;Cunningsworth, 1984Cunningsworth, , 1995McGrath, 2002;Sheldon, 1998;Ur, 1996;Williams, 1983; See also Mukundan & Ahour, 2010 for a review) mainly relied on existent or self-made checklists (i.e., criteria) to rate the match of a given textbook with a particular purpose (e.g., learners' academic literacy development). For example, using a rating scale on a checklist (4, to the greatest extent; 3, to a large extent; 2, to some extent; 1, just barely; 0, not at all), Williams (1983) presented a pre-use textbook evaluation scheme that consisted of three categories mainly informed by a meaning-making perspective of language learning: (1) general considerations, which includes learners' and teachers' needs; (2) language, which includes the functional use of speech, grammar, vocabulary, reading, and writing; and (3) technical information, which covers content, coverage, illustration, authenticity of the language, and writing style.…”