20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-3190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupling of computational methods for CROR installation effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the noise characteristics, the results are intended to serve as a database for the validation of numerical codes. Some preliminary achievements with a satisfactory agreement between the numerical and experimental data can be found in Sanders et al 13 measured was found to be 10 dB lower than the tonal noise sources under investigation in this work which was considered to be satisfactory. The tunnel produces a uniform velocity flow, which varies by only 0.5% over the area of the test section with a turbulence intensity, which can be controlled between 0.26-8% as the tunnel also contains a controllable turbulence generation system, see Pininfarina -Wind Tunnel 14 for more technical details.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the noise characteristics, the results are intended to serve as a database for the validation of numerical codes. Some preliminary achievements with a satisfactory agreement between the numerical and experimental data can be found in Sanders et al 13 measured was found to be 10 dB lower than the tonal noise sources under investigation in this work which was considered to be satisfactory. The tunnel produces a uniform velocity flow, which varies by only 0.5% over the area of the test section with a turbulence intensity, which can be controlled between 0.26-8% as the tunnel also contains a controllable turbulence generation system, see Pininfarina -Wind Tunnel 14 for more technical details.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In that work, which had a low Mach number of 0.1, similar to ours, negligible corrections of the order of magnitude of 1 dB were found to be required, apart from for one position at 150 , which is equivalent to our most downstream microphone no. 13, where a correction of 2 dB was needed. However, the application of such shear layer correction procedures to CROR emissions are still the subject of extensive study, are not straightforward and may not even be applicable for the more complicated sound fields generated by a CROR source.…”
Section: Test Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparisons of the acoustic emissions of the pusher and the tractor configuration tested at the same flow velocities and angles of incidence favor slightly the tractor configuration at 2*BPF which are the dominant rotor tones when ignoring the influence of the pylon. These experimental results are being utilized by GRA partners to develop and validate numerical codes for CROR noise prediction with initial results recently reported by Sanders et al 6,7 The more recent paper by Sanders reviews the literature for installation effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The perpendicular distance from the center of the front blade plane to the linear microphone array varies depending on both engine pylon angle and also on the extension which ranges between a minimum distance of 6.28D and a maximum of 6.65D. The work of Sanders et al 6,7 conducted a numerical simulation of the WENEMOR engine and demonstrated that the farfield region begins at a distance of 1.5D for the fundamental BPF.…”
Section: Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%