2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02326-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled subset simulation and active learning kriging reliability analysis method for rare failure events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach can be used to derive unbiased estimates for conditional failure probabilities and improve the accuracy of the results. For example, the probability of failure estimated through the AK-SS and the method by Ling et al (Ling et al 2019) are 1.4 × 10 −4 and 1.639 × 10 −4 , which are not close to the one estimated through the pure MCS. This is in part due to the effect of using MCMC to generate samples in the subsets, which requires sophisticated definitions of the proposal (jumping) sampling function.…”
Section: Convergence History For Intermediate Failure Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This approach can be used to derive unbiased estimates for conditional failure probabilities and improve the accuracy of the results. For example, the probability of failure estimated through the AK-SS and the method by Ling et al (Ling et al 2019) are 1.4 × 10 −4 and 1.639 × 10 −4 , which are not close to the one estimated through the pure MCS. This is in part due to the effect of using MCMC to generate samples in the subsets, which requires sophisticated definitions of the proposal (jumping) sampling function.…”
Section: Convergence History For Intermediate Failure Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This very large number is not computationally feasible to analyze using most regular PCs. The results here are compared with two other subset simulation-based method including AK-SS (Huang et al 2016) and the method proposed by Ling et al (Ling et al 2019), which hereafter is referred to as AK-SS (Ling et al).…”
Section: Convergence History For Intermediate Failure Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several algorithms have been proposed to deal with very small failure probabilities (10 −5 −10 −9 ) and multiple failure regions: Meta‐IS, MetaAK‐IS 2 , BSS, ASVR, 2 SMART, AK‐MCSi, GPSS, AK‐MCS‐IS, S4IS, and SS‐KK . Some other methods such as SORM or AK‐IS are suitable for very small failure probabilities, but rely on the existence of an assumed unique so‐called most probable failure point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%