2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled immersed interface and grid based particle method for three-dimensional electrohydrodynamic simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present network is similar in spirit to PINNs [9], here we only use one hidden layer with sufficiently small number of neurons so it reduces the computational complexity and learning workload significantly without sacrificing the accuracy. Moreover, as shown in some examples in next section, the present DCSNN not only achieves better accuracy than the traditional finite difference method such as immersed interface method [15,18,19] in solving Eq. ( 8) but also outperforms other piecewise DNN [14] in terms of accuracy and network complexity.…”
Section: Elliptic Interface Problemsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the present network is similar in spirit to PINNs [9], here we only use one hidden layer with sufficiently small number of neurons so it reduces the computational complexity and learning workload significantly without sacrificing the accuracy. Moreover, as shown in some examples in next section, the present DCSNN not only achieves better accuracy than the traditional finite difference method such as immersed interface method [15,18,19] in solving Eq. ( 8) but also outperforms other piecewise DNN [14] in terms of accuracy and network complexity.…”
Section: Elliptic Interface Problemsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We then compare the accuracy of the DCSNN solution with the 3D immersed interface solver proposed in [19]. Note that, in 3D IIM, the total degree of freedom, N deg , is now the sum of the number of Cartesian grid points m 3 and the augmented projection foots on the interface, m Γ .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the computational side, several simulation studies have solved the Melcher–Taylor leaky-dielectric model using boundary integral methods (Sherwood 1988; Lac & Homsy 2007; Lanauze, Walker & Khair 2015; Nganguia et al. 2016; Das & Saintillan 2017 a ) or grid-based methods (López-Herrera, Popinet & Herrada 2011; Hsu, Hu & Lai 2019; Theillard, Gibou & Saintillan 2019) and often match well with experiments (Ha & Yang 2000 a , b ; Salipante & Vlahovska 2010). It is also worth mentioning a related problem concerning the behaviour and breakup of conducting drops in electric fields (Dubash & Mestel 2007 a , b ; Karyappa, Deshmukh & Thaokar 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since his pioneering work, there have been several attempts to include various effects such as transient shape deformations (Esmaeeli & Sharifi 2011), transient charge relaxation and fluid acceleration (Lanauze, Walker & Khair 2013), or coupling with other fields such as gravity (Bandopadhyay et al 2016;Yariv & Almog 2016). On the computational side, several simulation studies have solved the Melcher-Taylor leaky-dielectric model using boundary integral methods (Sherwood 1988;Lac & Homsy 2007;Lanauze, Walker & Khair 2015;Nganguia et al 2016;Das & Saintillan 2017a) or grid-based methods (López-Herrera, Popinet & Herrada 2011;Hsu, Hu & Lai 2019;Theillard, Gibou & Saintillan 2019) and often match well with experiments (Ha & Yang 2000a,b;Salipante & Vlahovska 2010). It is also worth mentioning a related problem concerning the behaviour and breakup of conducting drops in electric fields (Dubash & Mestel 2007a,b;Karyappa, Deshmukh & Thaokar 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since his pioneering work, there have been several attempts to include various effects such as transient shape deformations (Esmaeeli 914 A22-2 Three-dimensional electrohydrodynamic drop theory & Sharifi 2011), transient charge relaxation and fluid acceleration (Lanauze, Walker & Khair 2013), or coupling with other fields such as gravity (Bandopadhyay et al 2016;Yariv & Almog 2016). On the computational side, several simulation studies have solved the Melcher-Taylor leaky-dielectric model using boundary integral methods (Sherwood 1988;Lac & Homsy 2007;Lanauze, Walker & Khair 2015;Nganguia et al 2016;Das & Saintillan 2017a) or grid-based methods (López-Herrera, Popinet & Herrada 2011;Hsu, Hu & Lai 2019;Theillard, Gibou & Saintillan 2019) and often match well with experiments (Ha & Yang 2000a,b;Salipante & Vlahovska 2010). It is also worth mentioning a related problem concerning the behaviour and breakup of conducting drops in electric fields (Dubash & Mestel 2007a,b;Karyappa, Deshmukh & Thaokar 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%