Glacial Sedimentary Processes and Products 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304435.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coupled Ice‐Sheet/Ice‐Shelf/Sediment Model Applied to a Marine‐Margin Flowline: Forced and Unforced Variations

Abstract: A standard large-scale ice-sheet model is extended by (i) adding ice stream-shelf flow using a combined set of scaled equations for sheet and shelf flow, and (ii) coupling with a deforming sediment model that predicts bulk sediment thickness. The combination of sheet and shelf flow equations is heuristic, but allows horizontal shear and longitudinal stretching without a priori assumptions about the flow regime, and a freely migrating grounding line. The sediment model includes bulk transport under ice assuming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), is based upon another assumption, and various other erosion laws tie the erosion rate to other powers of the sliding velocity (Hallet, 1979;Iverson, 1995;MacGregor et al, 2009), the ice flux (Kessler et al, 2008), or the basal shear stress (Pollard and Deconto, 2007), and a different choice would influence the patterns of erosion and the locations of maximum erosion rate. Comparing the magnitude of effects of erosion laws on developing topography can be difficult for a number of reasons: scaling factors and constants might vary; the ice physics, which can add further complications, determine the basal shear stress; and subglacial hydrology is still quite complicated.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(1), is based upon another assumption, and various other erosion laws tie the erosion rate to other powers of the sliding velocity (Hallet, 1979;Iverson, 1995;MacGregor et al, 2009), the ice flux (Kessler et al, 2008), or the basal shear stress (Pollard and Deconto, 2007), and a different choice would influence the patterns of erosion and the locations of maximum erosion rate. Comparing the magnitude of effects of erosion laws on developing topography can be difficult for a number of reasons: scaling factors and constants might vary; the ice physics, which can add further complications, determine the basal shear stress; and subglacial hydrology is still quite complicated.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluvial erosion processes are calculated from this discharge and the sediment supply, local topographic slope, and the channel width, all of which also are input into a linear sediment cover model (Braun and Sambridge, 1997). Hillslope processes are simulated from diffusion and a threshold landsliding algorithm when hillslopes steepen beyond a certain threshold (Burbank et al, 1996;Stolar et al, 2007). Within ICE-Cascade, the climate simulation is a combination of the inputs that govern the pattern of sea-level temperature and an orographic precipitation model (Yanites and Ehlers, 2012;Roe et al, 2003).…”
Section: Ice-cascade Orogen Development Model and Climate Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some models also differentiate between fast-and slow-flowing ice, such as ice shelves and grounded ice, respectively, to allow for a dynamic computation of the grounding line (e.g. Huybrechts, 1990;Huybrechts and de Wolde, 1999;Greve, 1995Greve, , 1997Ritz et al, 2001;Pollard and DeConto, 2007). These models are used, on the one hand, to predict the future development of the ice sheets and, on the other hand, to model their evolution during the past millennia and even millions of years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%