2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled hydrodynamic–structural model of the M4 wave energy converter

Abstract: a b s t r a c tA method is developed for modelling wave energy converters consisting of floats connected by slender structural elements. The hydrodynamic and structural dynamic analyses are separated in a two-stage process, though the model is fully coupled. The method of dynamic substructuring is used to achieve this separation. The linear diffraction/ radiation problem is solved with a finite element idealisation for axisymmetric floats, and drag forces are incorporated by equivalent linearization. Results f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, r = 0.08 (25) , as suggested in [22]. The sampling time is T = 0.009 s. The following 4 sets of simulation are done.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, r = 0.08 (25) , as suggested in [22]. The sampling time is T = 0.009 s. The following 4 sets of simulation are done.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the Capture Width Ratio (CWR) is a crucial metric for assessing the efficiency of a WEC in capturing wave energy. It can be expressed as follows [49]:…”
Section: Assessment Of Point-absorber Power Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed devices, such as the Wave Star [12], absorb energy from one DoF and have only one mode of motion. In contrast, floating devices may have multiple modes of motions and eventually absorb energy from one or two DoFs, as examples Pelamis [13], Weptos [14], and M4 [15] WECs. Only a few alternative designs, based on oscillation along an inclined axis, have been proposed [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%