43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-1252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coupled Disturbance Analysis Method Using Dynamic Mass Measurement Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19]. In general, the m s and m d are small enough to be ignored in the mass matrix of the flywheel in Eq.…”
Section: Static Imbalance and Dynamic Imbalancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[19]. In general, the m s and m d are small enough to be ignored in the mass matrix of the flywheel in Eq.…”
Section: Static Imbalance and Dynamic Imbalancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masterson et al [16][17][18] have conducted substantial research in the area of empirical and analytical reaction wheel disturbance models, and flywheel mass imbalances are considered to be the most significant, with an amplitude proportional to angular speed and a frequency equal to the rotation frequency (fundamental harmonic). Furthermore, Elias and Miller [19] have proposed a coupled disturbances analysis method using dynamic mass measurement techniques. Shigemune, Yoshiaki, and Masahito et al [20][21][22] have established a method to measure lower frequency disturbances induced by WAs, which are traditionally difficult to detect, and revealed that the inner dynamics of the WA closely relate to the disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current practice in the spacecraft structures' industry is to measure the excitation forces created by the source when rigidly mounted (blocked) on a rigid multi-axis dynamometric platform (Kistler table) [38,39], and then ap-ply them to the location where the source is mounted on the structure, adding a lumped inertia which represents the source [40,41,42,43]. This method clearly gives good results if the source's structure has resonance frequencies well beyond the frequency range of interest.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the sources are dynamically coupled to the satellite [43,44,38], in order to determine their impact on the platform response, two aspects have to be considered:…”
Section: Dynamic Coupling For 1 Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%