2017
DOI: 10.1002/fld.4358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled continuous and discontinuous finite element method for the incompressible flows

Abstract: Summary In this paper, we develop a coupled continuous Galerkin and discontinuous Galerkin finite element method based on a split scheme to solve the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. In order to use the equal order interpolation functions for velocity and pressure, we decouple the original Navier–Stokes equations and obtain three distinct equations through the split method, which are nonlinear hyperbolic, elliptic, and Helmholtz equations, respectively. The hybrid method combines the merits of discontin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This formulation proposed by [39,40] makes use of the incompressibility constraint ∇ • u = 0, and it is well understood that the rotational formulation significantly improves accuracy as compared to the Laplace formulation [53,52]; nevertheless the latter formulation ∇ 2 u is also used sometimes [61,62,38].…”
Section: High-order Dual Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This formulation proposed by [39,40] makes use of the incompressibility constraint ∇ • u = 0, and it is well understood that the rotational formulation significantly improves accuracy as compared to the Laplace formulation [53,52]; nevertheless the latter formulation ∇ 2 u is also used sometimes [61,62,38].…”
Section: High-order Dual Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark One might raise the question why the terms in equation ( 17) coming from the acceleration term evaluate the prescribed boundary data g u instead of simply evaluating the numerical solution u coming from the interior of the domain, since this is also done for the convective and viscous terms in the boundary conditions. From the formulations in [22,24,63,62,38] it is unclear whether the acceleration term in equation (17) should directly evaluate the numerical solution u if the time derivative is not known analytically. The same holds for the BDF time derivative terms in equation (18).…”
Section: High-order Dual Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the splitting scheme [28,29], we can obtain three subequations. We first neglect the terms about pressure and viscous in equation ( 8) and introduce an intermediate velocity u to replace u n+1 .…”
Section: Temporal Discretization and Splitting Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this difficulty, the upwind schemes are widely used for the DG discretization of the convective term such as Vijayasundaram numerical flux, 13,14 the Lesaint-Raviart flux, 15,16 or the local Lax-Friedrichs flux. 17,18 What is more, since the nonlinearity of the equations, numerous works of the temporal discretization formats have been done. [19][20][21] These formats may be classified into three groups of fully explicit scheme, fully implicit scheme, and semiimplicit scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%