1999
DOI: 10.1515/crll.1999.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counterexample to an integer analogue of Carathéodory's theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains an open question to determine a sharp upper bound in the Hilbert basis setting, in [9] an example is provided where M 0 (X) = 7 6 d . For an arbitrary finite set X ⊂ Z d , Eisenbrand and Shmonin [16] obtained the bound…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains an open question to determine a sharp upper bound in the Hilbert basis setting, in [9] an example is provided where M 0 (X) = 7 6 d . For an arbitrary finite set X ⊂ Z d , Eisenbrand and Shmonin [16] obtained the bound…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been conjectured by Cook, Fonlupt and Schrijver [3] that this integer analogue of Carathéodory's theorem holds true for any rational pointed cone. This conjecture was proven by Sebő [14] in dimensions ≤ 3 and has recently been disproved by Bruns, Gubeladze, Henk, Martin and Weismantel [2] in dimensions n ≥ 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general it is not. It is not even true that a Hilbert basis has a unimodular partition or a unimodular covering [2] and this counterexample inspires two more remarks. First, it cannot be expected that the equivalence of (i) and (v) can be reduced to Sturmfels' generic case.…”
Section: For Instance Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the converse does not hold and the most that is known in this direction is the existence of just one full dimensional subset of the columns of A which is unimodular [16]. Not even a "unimodular covering" of a Hilbert basis may be possible [2]. However, the converse does hold for normal fans of integral set packing polytopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%