Abstract:We give an example of a morphism of simplicial sets which is a monomorphism, bijective on 0-simplices, and a weak categorical equivalence, but which is not inner anodyne.This answers an open question of Joyal. Furthermore, we use this morphism to refute a plausible description of the class of fibrations in Joyal's model structure for quasi-categories.
“…For n = 2, the map on the left is actually an isomorphism since Λ S [2] is the union of two 1-simplices, one of which gets collapsed to a point to create Λ S [2] * i→i+1 . For n ≥ 3, we proceed by induction on |S|.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complication is that in an arbitrary simplicial set, the set of I-edges do not necessarily satisfy the simplicial 2-out-of-3 property (unless I = ∆ [1]). As a minimal counter-example, one can simply take ∆ [2] itself and glue in a copy of I along two of its non-degenerate edges. The takeaway is that no single I can be used to identify which edges we want to view as invertible in an arbitrary simplicial set (except for the special case when I = ∆ [1]).…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let U I and V I be I-augmented unordered triangulations which the given edges factor through. Call the remaining edge e. Then we can define T I by gluing U I and V I to the appropriate faces of ∆ [2] as in Figure 2, making the remaining edge a T I -edge. Proposition 3.24.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 4.1. When X = ∆ [2], we glue in a copy of I along the three red edges of ∆ [1] × ∆ [2] depicted in Figure 3. Example 4.5.…”
Section: Minimal Homotopically-behaved Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For k > 2, there are no new edges added in the pushout, so the first claim is immediate. For k = 2, since the two edges of Λ j [2] are sent to almost-I-edges, the new edge is also an almost-I-edge in the pushout X ⊔ Λ j [2] ∆ [2] by applying the simplicial 2-out-of-3 property from Proposition 3.23. In each of these cases, the inclusion X ֒→ ∆[k] ⊔ Λ j [k] X can be upgraded to an almost-I-augmented horn pushout because every edge of the horn in X is an almost-I-edge.…”
We use Cisinski's machinery to construct and study model structures on the category of simplicial sets whose classes of fibrant objects generalize quasicategories. We identify a lifting condition which captures the homotopical behavior of quasi-categories without the algebraic aspects and show that there is a model structure whose fibrant objects are precisely those which satisfy this condition. We also identify a localization of this model structure whose fibrant objects satisfy a "special horn lifting" condition similar to the one characterizing quasi-categories. This special horn model structure leads to a conjecture characterization of the bijective-on-0-simplices trivial cofibrations of the Joyal model structure. We also discuss how these model structures all relate to one another and to the minimal model structure.
“…For n = 2, the map on the left is actually an isomorphism since Λ S [2] is the union of two 1-simplices, one of which gets collapsed to a point to create Λ S [2] * i→i+1 . For n ≥ 3, we proceed by induction on |S|.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complication is that in an arbitrary simplicial set, the set of I-edges do not necessarily satisfy the simplicial 2-out-of-3 property (unless I = ∆ [1]). As a minimal counter-example, one can simply take ∆ [2] itself and glue in a copy of I along two of its non-degenerate edges. The takeaway is that no single I can be used to identify which edges we want to view as invertible in an arbitrary simplicial set (except for the special case when I = ∆ [1]).…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let U I and V I be I-augmented unordered triangulations which the given edges factor through. Call the remaining edge e. Then we can define T I by gluing U I and V I to the appropriate faces of ∆ [2] as in Figure 2, making the remaining edge a T I -edge. Proposition 3.24.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 4.1. When X = ∆ [2], we glue in a copy of I along the three red edges of ∆ [1] × ∆ [2] depicted in Figure 3. Example 4.5.…”
Section: Minimal Homotopically-behaved Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For k > 2, there are no new edges added in the pushout, so the first claim is immediate. For k = 2, since the two edges of Λ j [2] are sent to almost-I-edges, the new edge is also an almost-I-edge in the pushout X ⊔ Λ j [2] ∆ [2] by applying the simplicial 2-out-of-3 property from Proposition 3.23. In each of these cases, the inclusion X ֒→ ∆[k] ⊔ Λ j [k] X can be upgraded to an almost-I-augmented horn pushout because every edge of the horn in X is an almost-I-edge.…”
We use Cisinski's machinery to construct and study model structures on the category of simplicial sets whose classes of fibrant objects generalize quasicategories. We identify a lifting condition which captures the homotopical behavior of quasi-categories without the algebraic aspects and show that there is a model structure whose fibrant objects are precisely those which satisfy this condition. We also identify a localization of this model structure whose fibrant objects satisfy a "special horn lifting" condition similar to the one characterizing quasi-categories. This special horn model structure leads to a conjecture characterization of the bijective-on-0-simplices trivial cofibrations of the Joyal model structure. We also discuss how these model structures all relate to one another and to the minimal model structure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.