2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counterexample in quasi-category theory

Abstract: We give an example of a morphism of simplicial sets which is a monomorphism, bijective on 0-simplices, and a weak categorical equivalence, but which is not inner anodyne.This answers an open question of Joyal. Furthermore, we use this morphism to refute a plausible description of the class of fibrations in Joyal's model structure for quasi-categories.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For n = 2, the map on the left is actually an isomorphism since Λ S [2] is the union of two 1-simplices, one of which gets collapsed to a point to create Λ S [2] * i→i+1 . For n ≥ 3, we proceed by induction on |S|.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For n = 2, the map on the left is actually an isomorphism since Λ S [2] is the union of two 1-simplices, one of which gets collapsed to a point to create Λ S [2] * i→i+1 . For n ≥ 3, we proceed by induction on |S|.…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complication is that in an arbitrary simplicial set, the set of I-edges do not necessarily satisfy the simplicial 2-out-of-3 property (unless I = ∆ [1]). As a minimal counter-example, one can simply take ∆ [2] itself and glue in a copy of I along two of its non-degenerate edges. The takeaway is that no single I can be used to identify which edges we want to view as invertible in an arbitrary simplicial set (except for the special case when I = ∆ [1]).…”
Section: Since We Think Of Maps Out Of a Pinched (N + 1)-simplex ∆[N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations