2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counter-image to the gravitational arc in Abell 1201:Evidence for IMF variations, or a 10 10  M black hole?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this system the problematic feature is the distance from the lens to the images, and the separation between the images. Where these images close, and hint at a some linked structure this may bear a resemblance to the lens reported in Smith et al (2017), with a large arc, and no clearly observable counterimage. However, no evidence is present to define this as an arc.…”
Section: B2 2masxj13522523-3456007supporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, in this system the problematic feature is the distance from the lens to the images, and the separation between the images. Where these images close, and hint at a some linked structure this may bear a resemblance to the lens reported in Smith et al (2017), with a large arc, and no clearly observable counterimage. However, no evidence is present to define this as an arc.…”
Section: B2 2masxj13522523-3456007supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Quinn et al (2016) discussed the implications for the non-detection of a central image in the lens system CLASS B1030+074 with the data from VLA and the extended Multi-Element Remote-Linked Interferometer (e-MERLIN), and argued in favour of a central SMBH with a mass slightly greater than that implied by the local M BH − σ relation, yet again, whether the SMBH is required in the lens model is dependent on the mass profile chosen for the lensing galaxy. A relatively large SMBH mass of ∼ 1.2 × 10 10 M , lying well above the M BH − σ relation, has been inferred for the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG; central giant elliptical galaxy) in the cluster Abell 1201 at z = 0.17 based on the detection of a faint central image based on observations with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) (Smith et al 2017). In this case, however, the authors find that the observed parameters of the central image can be equally well explained by a cuspy stellar M/L ratio for the BCG.…”
Section: Dsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The presence of a central supermassive black hole, not included in our fiducial model, would also boost the central velocity dispersion, increasing the mass enclosed in the central regions in a similar way as a radially decreasing IMF normalization does (see e.g. Smith et al 2017a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%