2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icccnt45670.2019.8944885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-sensitive weighted Random Forest Technique for Credit Card Fraud Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of interesting approaches in the past were meta-classifier based fraud detection [23] , fraud detection based on behavior [16] , machine learning models [1], [22], [25] , data mining approaches [4], [25] , neural classification [9] , game-theory approach [21] web services based detection [24] , Hidden Markov Model [11], [14] , Predictive Analysis [19] and so on. In addition, applying some of the most robust classification algorithms [10] such as SVM [27] and ensemble algorithms [20] such as Random Forest [3], [15], [17] and Adaboost [13] was also preferred by a lot of researchers. Especially with voluminous data generated these days almost any algorithm which failed in the past could shine and the frauds of course shine accordingly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of interesting approaches in the past were meta-classifier based fraud detection [23] , fraud detection based on behavior [16] , machine learning models [1], [22], [25] , data mining approaches [4], [25] , neural classification [9] , game-theory approach [21] web services based detection [24] , Hidden Markov Model [11], [14] , Predictive Analysis [19] and so on. In addition, applying some of the most robust classification algorithms [10] such as SVM [27] and ensemble algorithms [20] such as Random Forest [3], [15], [17] and Adaboost [13] was also preferred by a lot of researchers. Especially with voluminous data generated these days almost any algorithm which failed in the past could shine and the frauds of course shine accordingly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of RF is its computational efficiency, as each single tree is built independently of each other [14]. Furthermore, [15] emphasize the ability of RF to deal with unbalanced datasets, the common issue related to the dataset with fraudulent credit card transactions. Unbalanced datasets are dealt with by incorporating the highly differenced misclassification costs of credit card detection and implementation of RF bagging ensemble learning model.…”
Section: B Random Forest Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, these distances are arranged in an increasing order [18]. The performance of the KNN algorithm is determined by the following three main factors: 1) the distance used for the location of the nearest neighbours; 2) the distance rule used to deliver a classification from the nearest neighbour; and 3) the k number of neighbours used for classification of the outcome variable [15]. When k = 1, the data point is assigned to the class of its nearest neighbour data point.…”
Section: K-nearest Neighbourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More and more methods and algorithms for anti-fraud detection have been proposed. Devi et al 1 introduce a cost-sensitive weighted random forest algorithm to detect credit card fraud. And some scholars also propose deep learning method to detect abnormal transactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%