Computing in Civil Engineering 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1061/9780784482421.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost Model to Evaluate the Economic Performance of Contour Crafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workflow is shown in Figure 1. The analysis of the articles related to the cost of 3D printing in construction has shown that the majority of these studies have applied a methodology to calculate the cost of the construction of a reinforced concrete wall [18], [19], [20], [21]. These studies show that the productivity and cost benefits of AM increase with the complexity of the shape of the wall.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The workflow is shown in Figure 1. The analysis of the articles related to the cost of 3D printing in construction has shown that the majority of these studies have applied a methodology to calculate the cost of the construction of a reinforced concrete wall [18], [19], [20], [21]. These studies show that the productivity and cost benefits of AM increase with the complexity of the shape of the wall.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that the productivity and cost benefits of AM increase with the complexity of the shape of the wall. The study of Zhang et al [18] is the only aimed specifically at defining a cost model for 3D printing in construction, proposing an activity-based cost model, i.e., based on the activities involved in the Contour Crafting process. Krimi et al [20] focused on confirming that the high production rate of 3D printing lowers overall construction costs.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation