2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00177-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost Malmquist productivity index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the Cost Malmquist productivity Index (CM) approach has been evolved as a preferred approach to estimate productivity change [1] Maniadakis et al (2004). Before the work of Maniadakis et al (2004), the research of productivity namely used the traditional production-based Malmquist indexes which failed to capture one of the most important aspects of managements, the allocative efficiency.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the Cost Malmquist productivity Index (CM) approach has been evolved as a preferred approach to estimate productivity change [1] Maniadakis et al (2004). Before the work of Maniadakis et al (2004), the research of productivity namely used the traditional production-based Malmquist indexes which failed to capture one of the most important aspects of managements, the allocative efficiency.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the work of Maniadakis et al (2004), the research of productivity namely used the traditional production-based Malmquist indexes which failed to capture one of the most important aspects of managements, the allocative efficiency. Maniadakis et al (2004) [1] suggested that the impact of allocative efficiency change on productivity change should be accounted for in the model. Since then the CM has become a preferred approach in the estimation of productivity.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth reflecting briefly on what these measures mean, as the revenue and allocative MPIs appear to have been overlooked apart from Maniadakis & Thanassoulis (2004) (who present the input-oriented form) and Zelenyuk (2006), but in some respects are superior to the primal MPI when price information is available because they take prices into account. The primal MPI measures the change in productivity from periods s to t, with the first fraction measuring the change w.r.t.. technology in period s and the second w.r.t.. technology in period t, without taking prices into account, which is useful when price information is unavailable.…”
Section: Change In Group Productivity Over Time Without Reallocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency change measures ''catching-up'' to the isoquant while technological change measures shifts in the isoquant. For example,see Weber and Domazlicky (1999) ;Nemoto and Goto (2005); Yu (2007); (Maniadakis and Thanassoulis (2004) and Radam (2007). Several researchers used econometric approaches to estimate the level of TFP and growth rate of TFP in manufacturing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%