1998
DOI: 10.1002/he.10305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost‐Effectiveness Model for the Assessment of Educational Productivity

Abstract: An educational productivity initiative at Worcester Polytechnic Institute illustrates cost‐effectiveness analysis techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is considerable literature pertaining to the costs associated with effective learning strategies (Callan, Ewell, Finney, and Jones, 2007;Catterall, 1998;Ehrmann and Milam, 1999;Levin and McEwan, 2001) as well as the issue of general cost management and control in higher education (Fonte, 1987;McClain, Krueger, and Kangas, 1989;McPherson, Schapiro, and Winston, 1993 ;Sherr and Lozier, 1991;Simpson, 1991), few articles provide the requisite granular detail necessary to craft a cost-reporting scheme for assessment. One exception is Ewell and Jones's monograph The Costs of Assessment, published by the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, which focused on "deriving typical direct costs associated with establishing a comprehensive institutional-assessment program" (Ewell and Jones, 1985, p. 9).…”
Section: Developing Guidelines For Assessment Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is considerable literature pertaining to the costs associated with effective learning strategies (Callan, Ewell, Finney, and Jones, 2007;Catterall, 1998;Ehrmann and Milam, 1999;Levin and McEwan, 2001) as well as the issue of general cost management and control in higher education (Fonte, 1987;McClain, Krueger, and Kangas, 1989;McPherson, Schapiro, and Winston, 1993 ;Sherr and Lozier, 1991;Simpson, 1991), few articles provide the requisite granular detail necessary to craft a cost-reporting scheme for assessment. One exception is Ewell and Jones's monograph The Costs of Assessment, published by the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, which focused on "deriving typical direct costs associated with establishing a comprehensive institutional-assessment program" (Ewell and Jones, 1985, p. 9).…”
Section: Developing Guidelines For Assessment Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional educational research provides some indications about how higher learning goals can best be achieved (for example, Astin, 1993Astin, , 1996Chickering and Gamson, 1987;Pascarella and Terenzini, 1991;Levin and Kosky, 1998). That literature emphasizes the importance of student involvement and classroom interaction with teachers and peers.…”
Section: Five Components To Enhance Productivity With Nontraditional mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty members were not allowed to achieve productivity in any way that seemed good to them but instead had to incorporate the required pedagogy. Another limit on faculty and departments was a strict accountability and assessment requirement: faculty submitted data on their course costs and outcomes, and the institution supported development of accounting models to determine productivity (Catterall, 1998).…”
Section: Five Components To Enhance Productivity With Nontraditional mentioning
confidence: 99%