2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Management of Low-risk Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Using Office-based Fulguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, further studies and new research methods could be meaningful to this unsolved problem. The Markov model mentioned in this article is generally used in medical decision making these years [ 19 22 ]. A Markov model arranges patients in different health states in the corresponding Markov states according to the natural disease history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, further studies and new research methods could be meaningful to this unsolved problem. The Markov model mentioned in this article is generally used in medical decision making these years [ 19 22 ]. A Markov model arranges patients in different health states in the corresponding Markov states according to the natural disease history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Markov model is capable of estimating a disease’s outcome by simulating disease progression where patients move through different health states over the preset cycles. It has been successfully used in the simulation of a head-to-head comparison of treatment efficacy [ 19 22 ]. In this article, we constructed a Markov model to make a comparison of efficacy between full dose BCG treatment and one-third dose BCG treatment for patients with intermediate and high-risk NMIBC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two European trials using laser photocoagulation techniques under local anaesthesia, savings of up to €2000 per procedure could be realized compared to TURBT . A US‐based cost‐analysis model from the Memorial‐Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre found that, despite a small absolute difference of only $37 per quality‐adjusted life‐years favouring office fulguration over outpatient TURBT, the long‐term follow‐up and protracted course of low‐grade BCa would result in significant overall cost savings .…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors described office-based tumors fulguration (36). This method may be a better method of choice in order to reduce the need of TURBTs for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%