2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost-benefit assessment of Salmonella-control strategies in pigs reared in the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several risk analysis and modeling frameworks were performed to identify and suggest control measures for the risk of foodborne disease caused by Salmonella from broiler chicken (8)(9)(10), layers (11), pigs (12)(13)(14), and dairy cattle (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several risk analysis and modeling frameworks were performed to identify and suggest control measures for the risk of foodborne disease caused by Salmonella from broiler chicken (8)(9)(10), layers (11), pigs (12)(13)(14), and dairy cattle (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lawson et al (22) indicated in their comparison that using home-mixed or acidified feeds for Danish pigs was financially beneficial in some cases. Gavin et al (24) found for the United Kingdom that two interventions using wet feed and organic acids in feed were able to provide a financial net benefit to the farms as means to control for Salmonella . By contrast, Goldbach and Alban (26) found that using specific home-mixed feed in herds with slaughter pigs and using acidified feed for slaughter pigs as means to control for Salmonella in Denmark were not socioeconomically profitable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies provide conflicting evidence on whether feed-related interventions to control Salmonella are economically viable. While some studies have found that feed-related interventions can be financially beneficial either as such or as part of a wider program [e.g., Lawson et al (22); Sundström et al (23); Gavin et al (24), FCC consortium (21)] other studies have found their costs higher than the benefits [e.g., Miller et al (25); Goldbach et al (26)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fellow had the opportunity to review and adapt a Salmonella QMRA for Spain, which was previously produced by APHA for EFSA and implemented for four European Union member states, but not Spain (Snary et al., 2016). The EFSA QMRA included a cost‐benefit component to help aid decision makers as to the best control measures to implement (Gavin et al., 2018).…”
Section: Description Of Work Programmementioning
confidence: 99%