2014
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/5/055101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A corresponding-state approach to quark-cluster matter

Abstract: A corresponding-state approach to quark-cluster matter * GUO Yan-Jun( ) 1;1) LAI Xiao-Yu( ) 2;2) XU Ren-Xin( ) 1,3;3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce them, searching for very high mass NSs is an essential method since the maximum mass of NSs determine the stiffness of the EoS. In the case of accretion disc reflection, the derived mass and radius of the NS in 4U 1746-37 could be reproduced in the framework of self-bound NS EoSs, including quark-cluster stars and bare strange stars (Guo et al 2014;Lai et al 2013;Lai & Xu 2009). On the other hand, searching for very low mass NSs is also an attractive way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce them, searching for very high mass NSs is an essential method since the maximum mass of NSs determine the stiffness of the EoS. In the case of accretion disc reflection, the derived mass and radius of the NS in 4U 1746-37 could be reproduced in the framework of self-bound NS EoSs, including quark-cluster stars and bare strange stars (Guo et al 2014;Lai et al 2013;Lai & Xu 2009). On the other hand, searching for very low mass NSs is also an attractive way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hadron star and hybrid/mixed star are gravity bound and covered by crusts with nuclei and electrons, whereas the quark star and The left black lines show the general relativity limit and the central density limit, respectively. Theoretical mass-radius relations for several NS EoS models are displayed, which were introduced by GS1 (Glendenning & Schaffner-Bielich 1999), AP4 (Akmal & Pandharipande 1997), MPA1 (Müther et al 1987), PAL1 (Prakash et al 1988), MS2 (Müller & Serot 1996), GLX123 (Guo et al 2014), and LX12 (Lai & Xu 2009;Lai et al 2013). The purple dot-dashed line represents the bare strange stars obtained from the MIT bag model EoS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…self-bound NS EoSs, including quark-cluster stars and bare strange stars (Lai & Xu 2009;Lai et al 2013;Guo et al 2014). In the case of accretion disk obscuration, the self-bound NSs and gravity-bound NSs (Akmal & Pandharipande 1997;Müther et al 1987) are acceptable in 1σ and 2σ confidence levels of the mass and radius of NSs in 4U 1746-37, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reasonable that electromagnetic [17,19] non-atomic X-rays Plankian radiation of X-ray very thin atmosphere above surface [10,11] absorption in thermal spectra hydromagnetic oscillation of e − sea [23] strangeness barrier low-z emission, type-I XRB 2-flavored matter separated from 3-f [9] optical/UV excess of XDINS bremsstrahlung radiation [10] global stiff EoS high M max (2 ∼ 3M ⊙ ) non-relativistic strangeon, hard core [3,4,24,25] anisotropic pressure SGR/AXPs burst and flare quake-induced energy release [20,26,27] rigidity precession, GW radiation solid, mountain building [2,28] matter should be separated sharply from strong matter. Bare surface of strangeon star could help in understanding the non-atomic spectra of XDINSs [11].…”
Section: Strangeon Star Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%