1956
DOI: 10.3109/00365515609049261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Correction Factor for Helium Absorption in Lung Volume Determinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the helium dilution method is prone to other sources of error such as the helium concentration in the gas tank, which usually has a tolerance degree of about 5%, and possible diffusion of helium out of the balloon. In addition the possibility of helium uptake during EELV measurement has been discussed in the literature and is thought to be controversial [ 25 - 27 ]. Theoretical considerations show that the possible helium uptake is limited: the solubility coefficient of helium is 1.13 × 10 -5 ml/ml/mmHg [ 28 ] with a maximal body helium uptake of about 45 ml in 40 L body water and about 5 ml in well perfused body compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the helium dilution method is prone to other sources of error such as the helium concentration in the gas tank, which usually has a tolerance degree of about 5%, and possible diffusion of helium out of the balloon. In addition the possibility of helium uptake during EELV measurement has been discussed in the literature and is thought to be controversial [ 25 - 27 ]. Theoretical considerations show that the possible helium uptake is limited: the solubility coefficient of helium is 1.13 × 10 -5 ml/ml/mmHg [ 28 ] with a maximal body helium uptake of about 45 ml in 40 L body water and about 5 ml in well perfused body compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another investigator argued that the correction for helium absorption could be based only on very approximate estimates and chose to omit a correction [17]. In a study of the time-related disappearance of helium from the helium dilution system in two normal subjects, it was concluded that for a 7 min procedure, the correction in FRC should be 105 mL [24]. A graphical solution to the problem by extrapolation of the concentration-time curve to the beginning of the alteration in gas concentration was proposed [25] but subsequently rejected [14].…”
Section: Paths Of Helium Loss and Effect Of Nitrogen Excretionmentioning
confidence: 99%