Empirical Multimodality Research 2021
DOI: 10.1515/9783110725001-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Corpus-Based Approach to Color, Shape, and Typography in Logos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and aesthetic appraisal (e.g., serif, slab, orientation, stem, weight, obliqueness) that are not seen in other geometric features—assuming, that is, typeface can be regarded as a form of geometric feature (Keage et al, 2014; Kuvykaite et al, 2009). Some typeface families (i.e., a group of typefaces sharing the same design language; see Zeng et al, 2019) have also been found to prime semantic meanings and personalities (Celhay et al, 2015; Johannessen et al, 2021; van Leeuwen, 2006). Nevertheless, despite the diverse psychological effects of typeface, its taste profile is most notably determined by the degree of font curvilinearity among the other typeface attributes that have been investigated to date (Velasco, Hyndman, & Spence, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and aesthetic appraisal (e.g., serif, slab, orientation, stem, weight, obliqueness) that are not seen in other geometric features—assuming, that is, typeface can be regarded as a form of geometric feature (Keage et al, 2014; Kuvykaite et al, 2009). Some typeface families (i.e., a group of typefaces sharing the same design language; see Zeng et al, 2019) have also been found to prime semantic meanings and personalities (Celhay et al, 2015; Johannessen et al, 2021; van Leeuwen, 2006). Nevertheless, despite the diverse psychological effects of typeface, its taste profile is most notably determined by the degree of font curvilinearity among the other typeface attributes that have been investigated to date (Velasco, Hyndman, & Spence, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%