2006
DOI: 10.1080/10228190608566259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A corpus-based analysis of Involved aspects of student writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noting negative attitudes towards idiosyncratic usage of speech forms in BSAE, Pienaar (: 148) makes observations on the attempts of purists to introduce what is called “plain language” in South Africa because BSAE speaking politicians use an opaque, incoherent and evasive language, which showed a “reflection of linguistic conventions in African languages”. This hint about informal language register is also found in the work of van Rooy and Terblanche () who carried out a study on a learner corpus of mother‐tongue speakers of Setswana (one of the indigenous African languages). They found a speech pattern that is less formal, more colloquial and general, that has ambiguous cohesive ties, and that is cautious and polite when a claim is made.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Noting negative attitudes towards idiosyncratic usage of speech forms in BSAE, Pienaar (: 148) makes observations on the attempts of purists to introduce what is called “plain language” in South Africa because BSAE speaking politicians use an opaque, incoherent and evasive language, which showed a “reflection of linguistic conventions in African languages”. This hint about informal language register is also found in the work of van Rooy and Terblanche () who carried out a study on a learner corpus of mother‐tongue speakers of Setswana (one of the indigenous African languages). They found a speech pattern that is less formal, more colloquial and general, that has ambiguous cohesive ties, and that is cautious and polite when a claim is made.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This finding is consistent with research on Chinese English learners’ argumentative writing in different contexts (e.g., Pan, 2012; Zhao & Wang, 2017), which indicates that Chinese English learners’ argumentative writing is characterized by involvedness regardless of the writing conditions. It is also congruent with studies regarding involvement and writer/reader visibility in argumentative essays (e.g., Petch-Tyson, 1998; van Rooy & Terblanche, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Previous cross-linguistic studies have reported similar findings regarding interpersonal involvement and writer/reader visibility in learners’ writing. For example, van Rooy and Terblanche (2006) found that Tswana learners’ English writing was less formal and more colloquial, as they used the features of involvement 20% more often than native writers. In analyzing the linguistic features that mark writer/reader visibility in EFL learners’ writing, Petch-Tyson (1998) found that L2 learners used more features of writer visibility in their writing and that learners from different L1 backgrounds manifest them differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remark is often made that Outer Circle varieties sound overly formal (see Schneider 2007: 101; De Klerk and Gough 2002: 368). Nevertheless, some colloquial features are observed in writing, especially more situation‐dependent referencing, more dynamic presentation of events, more deliberate attempts to engage the reader as a conversation partner, and higher frequencies of grammatical constructions that occur more frequently in native speech than native writing (for Black South African English, see Van Rooy 2006, 2008; Van Rooy and Terblanche 2006, 2009; Terblanche 2009).…”
Section: Input and Innovation In The Outer Circlementioning
confidence: 99%