2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey

Abstract: BackgroundThe prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is increasing globally resulting in an increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes and health system costs. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of NAS prevention and management strategies is very weak and further research initiatives are critically needed to support meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. In NAS research, the choice of outcomes and the use of valid, responsive and feasible measurement instruments are crucial. There is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven published protocols were identified: endometriosis, termination of pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, diabetes in pregnancy, neonatal abstinence syndrome, gastroschisis, and autologous fat grafting (Table S1). The protocols were published in 2015 ( n = 1), 2016 ( n = 5), or January 2017 ( n = 1). Five protocols described core outcome sets funded by international funders, World Health Organization, national funders, including Health Research Board (Ireland), National Institute of Health Research (UK), and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (UK), or regional funders such as Barts Health Charity (London, UK) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seven published protocols were identified: endometriosis, termination of pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, diabetes in pregnancy, neonatal abstinence syndrome, gastroschisis, and autologous fat grafting (Table S1). The protocols were published in 2015 ( n = 1), 2016 ( n = 5), or January 2017 ( n = 1). Five protocols described core outcome sets funded by international funders, World Health Organization, national funders, including Health Research Board (Ireland), National Institute of Health Research (UK), and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (UK), or regional funders such as Barts Health Charity (London, UK) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five protocols described core outcome sets funded by international funders, World Health Organization, national funders, including Health Research Board (Ireland), National Institute of Health Research (UK), and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (UK), or regional funders such as Barts Health Charity (London, UK) . The scope of the core outcome set was clearly stated in five protocols . All protocols described systematic reviews to identify potential core outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support research initiatives aimed at defining high‐quality, evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines for NAS. A large international trial was recently designed to develop a consensus‐based core outcome set for NAS . This trial will be the starting point for designing large multicenter trials and systematic reviews with the aim of improving research quality.…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioid analjeziklerin gebelik kategorisi ise "C"dir. Hamilelik döneminde opioid analjezik kullanan kadınların bebeklerinde neonatal yoksunluk sendromu görülme ihtimali bulunmaktadır (44).…”
Section: Opioid Analjeziklerin Klinik Farmakolojisiunclassified