A coordinated cross‐disciplinary research initiative to address an increased incidence of narcolepsy following the 2009–2010 Pandemrix vaccination programme in Sweden
Abstract:In response to the 2009-2010 influenza A(H1N1) pdm09 pandemic, a mass vaccination programme with the AS03-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1) vaccine Pandemrix was initiated in Sweden. Unexpectedly, there were a number of narcolepsy cases amongst vaccinated children and adolescents reported. In this review, we summarize the results of a joint cross-disciplinary national research effort to investigate the adverse reaction signal from the spontaneous reporting system and to better understand possible causative mechanis… Show more
“…Whereas genetic 1-6 epidemiological 7-11 and pathophysiological [12][13][14] studies implicate autoimmunity in response to flu infection in type 1 narcolepsy (T1N), a disease caused by hypocretin (HCRT) neuronal loss [15][16][17] the identity of the autoantigen is unknown.…”
“…Whereas genetic 1-6 epidemiological 7-11 and pathophysiological [12][13][14] studies implicate autoimmunity in response to flu infection in type 1 narcolepsy (T1N), a disease caused by hypocretin (HCRT) neuronal loss [15][16][17] the identity of the autoantigen is unknown.…”
“…Unfortunately, no firm conclusions could be drawn because of a perceived underreporting of Norwegian influenza cases. A substudy within the MPA narcolepsy research program had the objective to elucidate the same questions, but incomplete information of influenza incidence also in Sweden rendered this unsuccessful …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substudy within the MPA narcolepsy research program had the objective to elucidate the same questions, but incomplete information of influenza incidence also in Sweden rendered this unsuccessful. 8 For most outcomes, a delay between disease onset and a registry- represents another approach to strengthen diagnoses from administrative data. 18 The date for the health care contact or hospital admission is usually considered to represent the date for occurrence of the event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] An important research objective identified early after the signal of a suspected association was how incidence of narcolepsy and the association with vaccination would develop over time. 8 In order to investigate that, consideration must be given to the time course from exposure to the vaccine, to development of first symptoms, how rapidly progression of disease then leads to clinical contact, and how long the delay caused by referral for diagnostic procedures and specialist contact is, before a diagnosis is established in a registry.…”
Purpose
To estimate risk for narcolepsy in defined time windows following exposure to adjuvanted A(H1N1) pandemic vaccine (Pandemrix) and impact of different definitions of index date for the narcolepsy diagnosis.
Methods
Vaccine exposure in approximately 30% of the Swedish population in 2009 was linked to information on narcolepsy diagnosis retrieved from the national patient registry. Cases were verified by a systematic chart review. Poisson regression was used to compare incidence in defined time windows following vaccination.
Results
Of 266 cases of narcolepsy identified, 25% (66/266) were prevalent cases with symptom onset documented before vaccine exposure. Incident cases had a median time interval between first symptom and the date recorded in the patient registry of 64 weeks (IQR 39‐107) when vaccinated (N = 182) and 65 weeks (IQR 51‐72) when unvaccinated (N = 16). With first symptom defining index date, the adjusted risk for narcolepsy in younger patients was increased 14 times during the first year after vaccination, three times elevated the second year, but with no detectable increased risk more than 2 years after vaccination exposure. Using the index date from the patient registry, the adjusted increase in risk was about seven times elevated for all three time intervals.
Conclusions
The magnitude of the estimated increased risk for narcolepsy following exposure to the A(H1N1) pandemic vaccine is highly dependent on the method used to determine the index date for disease onset. The sometimes very long and potentially variable interval from first symptom to a health care registry diagnosis complicates estimations of risk.
“…1 Increased incidence was observed in Finland, Norway and Sweden following Pandemrix®vaccination (A/California/7/2009 NYMC X-179A, AS03-Adjuvanted H1N1 Influenza A Vaccine) in conjunction with the 2009 influenza pandemic. [2][3][4][5][6][7] While the aetiology of NT1 is unknown, indirect evidences support an autoimmune origin, including a strong association with HLA-DQB1*06:02 and with other genes with immune regulatory functions. [8][9][10][11] Pandemrix®-vaccination as a unique and unpredictable environmental trigger, and possibly the virus itself, would be compatible with an autoimmune genesis.…”
Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic sleep disorder caused by a specific loss of hypocretin‐producing neurons. The incidence of NT1 increased in Sweden, Finland and Norway following Pandemrix®‐vaccination, initiated to prevent the 2009 influenza pandemic. The pathogenesis of NT1 is poorly understood, and causal links to vaccination are yet to be clarified. The strong association with Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQB1*06:02 suggests an autoimmune pathogenesis, but proposed autoantigens remain controversial. We used a two‐step approach to identify autoantigens in patients that acquired NT1 after Pandemrix®‐vaccination. Using arrays of more than 9000 full‐length human proteins, we screened the sera of 10 patients and 24 healthy subjects for autoantibodies. Identified candidate antigens were expressed in vitro to enable validation studies with radiobinding assays (RBA). The validation cohort included NT1 patients (n = 39), their first‐degree relatives (FDR) (n = 66), population controls (n = 188), and disease controls representing multiple sclerosis (n = 100) and FDR to type 1 diabetes patients (n = 41). Reactivity towards previously suggested NT1 autoantigen candidates including Tribbles homolog 2, Prostaglandin D2 receptor, Hypocretin receptor 2 and α‐MSH/proopiomelanocortin was not replicated in the protein array screen. By comparing case to control signals, three novel candidate autoantigens were identified in the protein array screen; LOC401464, PARP3 and FAM63B. However, the RBA did not confirm elevated reactivity towards either of these proteins. In summary, three putative autoantigens in NT1 were identified by protein array screening. Autoantibodies against these candidates could not be verified with independent methods. Further studies are warranted to identify hypothetical autoantigens related to the pathogenesis of Pandemrix®‐induced NT1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.