2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13192759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ConvLSTM Conjunction Model for Groundwater Level Forecasting in a Karst Aquifer Considering Connectivity Characteristics

Abstract: Groundwater is an important water resource, and groundwater level (GWL) forecasting is a useful tool for supporting the sustainable management of water resources. Existing studies have shown that GWLs can be accurately predicted by combining an artificial neural network model with meteorological and hydrological factors. However, GWL data are typically geographic spatiotemporal series data, and current studies have considered only the spatial distance factor when predicting GWLs. In karst aquifers, the GWL is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is illustrated how the number of CNN layers impacts the performance of the prediction systems. Second, the results from proposed method compared with DeepYield [4], ConvLSTM [49], 3DCNN [50] and CNN-LSTM [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is illustrated how the number of CNN layers impacts the performance of the prediction systems. Second, the results from proposed method compared with DeepYield [4], ConvLSTM [49], 3DCNN [50] and CNN-LSTM [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Crop Yield Perdition Comparing Approach: The results from proposed methodologies compared with DeepYield [4], ConvLSTM [49], 3DCNN [50], and CNN-LSTM [38]. Simulations have been repeated in the same condition for all competitive methods to have a fair comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are underwhelming when it comes to the actual performance of the models in this study compared to previous studies. For instance, Malakar, Wunch, Solgi, Afan and Guo [25,26,39,61,62], all report far superior performance scores across several metrics for deep learning models including LSTMs. Even the GBDT model in this study demonstrated much lower performance scores than previous studies using classical and ensemble machine learning approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there was a study to predict river flow rates with high accuracy by providing guidelines for input training data [4]. In addition, real-time groundwater-level prediction [29], extreme water-level prediction by highest tide [30,31], and real-time urban-river-flood-level prediction, using various DNN models, have been effectively performed recently [32]. However, until recently, there were not many studies to improve the accuracy of predicting water levels with very high temporal variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%