2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3093164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Convex Optimization Framework for Minimum Lap Time Design and Control of Electric Race Cars

Abstract: published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original formulation was in the form of a second-order cone program [29]. Extensions included gearshift optimization with an iterative scheme [30], the optimization of a continuously variably transmission [31], the consideration of thermal constraints stemming from the electric motors using a quasi-convex formulation [32] and the optimization of the low-level operation of the F1 powertrain with NLP [33]. The maximum velocity profile has several drawbacks: While it can be easily measured at points on the circuit where the car was actually grip-limited, extrapolation backwards in distance at corner entries and forwards at corner exits is required to specify a useful constraint, relying either on imprecise heuristics or on complex vehicle dynamic simulations.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original formulation was in the form of a second-order cone program [29]. Extensions included gearshift optimization with an iterative scheme [30], the optimization of a continuously variably transmission [31], the consideration of thermal constraints stemming from the electric motors using a quasi-convex formulation [32] and the optimization of the low-level operation of the F1 powertrain with NLP [33]. The maximum velocity profile has several drawbacks: While it can be easily measured at points on the circuit where the car was actually grip-limited, extrapolation backwards in distance at corner entries and forwards at corner exits is required to specify a useful constraint, relying either on imprecise heuristics or on complex vehicle dynamic simulations.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. Silverstone Circuit: Investigation of the split acceleration approach given in (31). Shown are the positive and negative components a + p and a − p of the propulsive acceleration, as well as their product.…”
Section: Effect Of the Performance Envelope Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to [15], [16], the motor mass m m is modeled linear in relation to the maximum motor power P m,max as…”
Section: B Vehicle Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P m,loss represents the EM losses. While previous convex EM models, such as the quadratic model from [16], explicitly depend on both the EM speed and power, in this paper we devise a different approach based on the fact that the mechanical EM power P m to be provided is known in advance. Specifically, for each EM power value at time t, P m , we determine the power loss as a function of the EM speed ω m (t):…”
Section: Motor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation