2006
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A convergent adaptive finite element method for the primal problem of elastoplasticity

Abstract: SUMMARYThe boundary value problem representing one time step of the primal formulation of elastoplasticity with positive hardening leads to a variational inequality of the second kind with some nondifferentiable functional. This paper establishes an adaptive finite element algorithm for the solution of this variational inequality that yields the energy reduction and, up to higher order terms, the R-linear convergence of the stresses with respect to the number of loops. Applications include several plasticity m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of the reliability of η uses Jensen inequality as in [4], whereas in [5] using inverse estimates and convex analysis we prove a local discrete efficiency estimate in terms of the discrete energies, and the existence of positive constants ρ E , ρ with ρ E < 1, depending on the regularity of the initial triangulation T 0 and on the material parameters, such that there holds δ +1 ≤ ρ E δ + ρ(osc 2 (f ) + osc 2 (g)) with δ := J(w ) − J(w) and similar definition for δ +1 . The control of the data oscillations osc (f ) and osc (g) with conditions similar to (3) as step (e) of the adaptive algorithm using the inner node property leads finally to the existence of a sequence (α ) ∈N linearly convergent to zero such that there holds |σ − σ | C −1 ;Ω ≤ α .…”
Section: Output Discrete Stress Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof of the reliability of η uses Jensen inequality as in [4], whereas in [5] using inverse estimates and convex analysis we prove a local discrete efficiency estimate in terms of the discrete energies, and the existence of positive constants ρ E , ρ with ρ E < 1, depending on the regularity of the initial triangulation T 0 and on the material parameters, such that there holds δ +1 ≤ ρ E δ + ρ(osc 2 (f ) + osc 2 (g)) with δ := J(w ) − J(w) and similar definition for δ +1 . The control of the data oscillations osc (f ) and osc (g) with conditions similar to (3) as step (e) of the adaptive algorithm using the inner node property leads finally to the existence of a sequence (α ) ∈N linearly convergent to zero such that there holds |σ − σ | C −1 ;Ω ≤ α .…”
Section: Output Discrete Stress Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the same line as [3] this short note states the energy reduction and the R−linear convergence of the stresses for a conforming FE method of the primal problem of plasticity [8]. Proof and details are given elsewhere [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate discretization schemes for plasticity problems with hardening have been investigated extensively in the recent past. Here we only mention [3,10,9,43] for adaptive finite element methods. Concerning numerical solution methods, we refer to the multigrid approach in [47], various generalized Newton methods in finite dimensions [12,20,42,47,48], including the standard return mapping algorithm in [44] as well as interior point strategies, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty here is the nonsmoothness of the subdifferential operator ∂Ψ(•) as well as the nonlinearity of the map q → D q E(t, q). In the linear case this would reduce to classical evolutionary variational inequalities, for which the numerics is well studied; see, e.g., [29,1,2,15,14,13,41,42,51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). A posteriori estimates are established in [13], indeed paving the way to the possibility of applying adaptive techniques to elastoplastic problems [1,15,14,51]. Error control for strain gradient plasticity is presented in [20] where, nevertheless, the extra regularity (u, z) ∈…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%