A Controlled Trial of Brief Intervention Versus Brief Advice for At-Risk Drinking Trauma Center Patients

Soderstrom, Carl A.; DiClemente, Carlo C.; Dischinger, Patricia C.; Hebel, J. Richard; McDuff, David; Auman, Kimberly M.; Kufera, Joseph A.

doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31804bdb26

Cited by 108 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(45 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fourteen studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in this review: Antti-Poika and Karaharju (1988); Blow et al (2006); Daeppen et al (2007); Dauer, Rubio, Coris, and Valls (2006); Gentilello et al (1999);Longabaugh et al (2001); Maio et al (2005); Mello et al (2005);Neumann et al (2006); Runge (2002) ;Schermer, Moyers, Miller, and Bloomfield (2006) ;Smith, Hodgson, Bridgeman, and Shepherd (2003); Soderstrom et al (2007); Sommers et al (2006). The studies are referred to by the name of the first author in the text as well as in Tables 1 and 2.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients

Nilsén¹,

Baird²,

Mello³

et al. 2008

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

183

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Soderstrom (2007) CAGE, AUDIT-C, SIP, questions on drinking history questions, readiness to change, and risk-taking.…”

Section: Sommers (2006)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients

Nilsén¹,

Baird²,

Mello³

et al. 2008

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

183

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…20,21 Reincidence of illegal behavior or involvement in accidents is a problem with enormous sociosanitary and economic implications, and in Spain this issue requires urgent attention. In the hospital setting, secondary prevention measures can reduce recidivism by almost 50%, 22,23 with an excellent cost-effectiveness ratio. 24 Like all new management activities, the implementation of secondary prevention is not without difficulties.…”

Section: Palabras Clavementioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges in care of trauma patient in Spain. The need for implementation of scientific evidence including secondary prevention

Mondéjar

Álvarez

Luque

2014

Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mortality of trauma patients has improved significantly in recent decades due to a combination of factors: medical care, educational campaigns and structural changes. Generalization of both out-of hospital emergence medical services and the hospital care in specific centers for traumatized has undoubtedly contributed to this decline, but other factors such as periodic campaigns to prevent workplace and traffic accidents, as well as improvements in the road network have played a key role.The challenge now is to contain mortality, for which is essential an analysis of the situation to detect potential areas of improvement.The application of diagnostic or therapeutic actions with scientific evidence is associated with lower mortality, but as in other areas of medicine, the application of scientific evidence in trauma patients is barely 50%. Moreover, nearly 90% of trauma deaths occur in the crash site or during the first 72 h of hospitalization, the vast majority as a result of injuries incompatible with life. In these circumstances it is clear that prevention is the most cost-effective activity. As medical practitioners, our role in prevention is mainly focused on the secondary prevention to avoid recidivism, for which it is necessary to identify the possible risk factors (frequently alcohol, illegal drugs, psychotropic medication, etc.) and implement a brief motivational intervention. This activity can reduce recidivism by nearly 50%. In Spain, the activity in this field is negligible; therefore, measures should be implemented for dissemination of secondary prevention in trauma.

show abstract

“…SBIRT reduces risk of physical trauma and the percentage of patients who go without specialized substance use treatment  Studies on brief intervention in trauma centers and emergency departments have documented positive effects such as reductions in alcohol consumption, 12 successful referral to and participation in alcohol treatment programs, 13 and reduction in repeat injuries and injury hospitalizations 14,15 . Given SBIRT's demonstrated cost and health savings, federal agencies such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Veterans Administration, Department of Defense and the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, as well as managed care providers and major medical associations, have recommended SBIRT's routine use.…”

Section: Sbirt Decreases Severity Of Drug and Alcohol Usementioning

confidence: 99%

One-Visit Behavioral Intervention for Older Primary Care Patients with Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms

Gum

Schonfeld

Tyler

et al. 2016

Southern Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Controlled Trial of Brief Intervention Versus Brief Advice for At-Risk Drinking Trauma Center Patients

Cited by 108 publications

References 37 publications

A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients

A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients

Challenges in care of trauma patient in Spain. The need for implementation of scientific evidence including secondary prevention

One-Visit Behavioral Intervention for Older Primary Care Patients with Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About