1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80318-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A controlled comparison of continuous versus intermittent feeding in the treatment of infants with intestinal disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Others have suggested that IBG may be more beneficial because of lower risk of precipitation into the delivery system or because of ease of administration because it does not require as much equipment; 4,5 however, this may be compensated by the nursing time required to deliver a bolus feeding. IBG, on the other hand, has been associated with increasing gastroesophageal reflux, abdominal distention, apnea, and bradycardia attributable to increased vagal stimulation and aspiration because of poor gastric motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Others have suggested that IBG may be more beneficial because of lower risk of precipitation into the delivery system or because of ease of administration because it does not require as much equipment; 4,5 however, this may be compensated by the nursing time required to deliver a bolus feeding. IBG, on the other hand, has been associated with increasing gastroesophageal reflux, abdominal distention, apnea, and bradycardia attributable to increased vagal stimulation and aspiration because of poor gastric motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although intermittent bolus feeding has been advocated because it is more physiological, as it mimics the hormonal profile of meal feeding, continuous feeding is still indicated for some patients due to feeding intolerance (20,58). Recently, we demonstrated, using neonatal pigs as a model for the human neonate, that orogastric continuous feeding blunts protein synthesis in skeletal muscle compared with intermittent bolus feeding (26,32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous feeds appear to be more effective in infants with a massive loss of intestine. 11 It should be pointed out that if feeds are not provided orally, non-nutritive sucking should be encouraged to avoid oral aversion as this is often seen in these infants. The choice of feeding requires understanding of the effects of the intestine lost.…”
Section: Principles Of Medical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%