A Controllable False Data Injection Attack for a Cyber Physical System

Adaptive terminal sliding mode controller design for cyber‐physical systems under external disturbance and actuator cyber‐attack

“…For the extensive part of CPSs application, multiple subjects have been studied, for example, stability analysis, 4 fault detection, 15,16 fault‐tolerant control, 17 attack‐tolerant control, 18 filtering, 19,20 observer‐based control, 21 security problems, 22 backstepping control, 23 adaptive control, 6,24 $$$ {H}_{\infty }- $$$ control, 25 and various robust control 26,27 . The security problems of CPSs are not novel for the control area, especially in the fault tolerant control field and also fault detection, but whereas CPSs are connected to the Internet for remote monitoring and controlling system, they become more vulnerable to various types of attack such as false data injection attacks, 5,28 denial‐of‐service (DoS) attacks, 29–31 replay attacks, 32 deception attacks, 33 integrity attacks, 34 malware attack, 35 and so on. These security problems are very important and are necessary to extensive attention.…”

“…In the field of the CPSs, various resilient control strategies have been studied in Reference 1,4–7,9–30. Moreover, to the best of the authors' knowledge, very little considerations have been paid for the robust controller design problem of CPSs and no investigation is provided regarding CPSs under external disturbances and actuator cyber‐attacks in the finite time through adaptive TSM control technique.…”

Adaptive non‐singular second‐order terminal sliding mode control for cyber‐physical systems subject to actuator cyber‐attacks and unwanted disturbances

“…For the wide part of CPSs operation, numerous matters have been investigated, such as stability analysis, 2 security problems, 8 filtering, 13,14 attack‐tolerant control, 15 fault‐tolerant control, 16 fault detection, 17,18 observer‐based control, 19 backstepping control, 20 adaptive control, 7,21 $$$ {H}^{\infty } $$$ control, 22 and various robust control 23,24 . Insomuch as CPSs are connected to the internet for remote monitoring and controlling system, they have become much vulnerable to attack different types such as, false data injection attacks, 3,25 replay attacks, 8 deception attacks, 26 integrity attacks, 27 malware attack, 28 and Denial‐of‐Service (DoS) attacks 29–31 . These security problems are very important to immense attention.…”

“…Observer–based $$$ {H}^{\infty } $$$ control method is proposed in Reference 22 for the CPSs subject to DoS jamming attacks. A controllable false data injection attack for a CPS is applied in Reference 25, and an adaptive fault estimation for CPSs with alternating DoS attacks have been suggested in Reference 29. In the Reference 30 distributed CPSs stabilization method under DoS attack is proposed.…”

“…In the context of the cyber‐physical systems, various researches and control methods have been offered in References 1–10,12–31,33,54. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, very little considerations have been paid to robust control design issue for CPSs and no investigation is provided regarding to CPSs based on adaptive non‐singular SOTSM control technique with nonlinear switching surfaces and manifolds.…”