This study attempted t o extend the applicability of the Midi-Rlult to psychiat,ric inpatients. While high correspondence of group mean data and high comparability in identifying valid and invalid profiles resulted, analysis of individual profile pairs revealed a lack of correspondence with respect to scale high point codes and general profile elevations. The Midi-Mult seems to have limited applicability with hospitalized psychiatric patients. ARMENTROUT, J. A. Correspondence of the MMPI and 3lini-Mult in a college population. ARMENTROUT, J. A. and ROUZEK, I). L. Utility of the Mini-Mult with adolescents. .I. cons&. J . din. Psychol., 1970, 26, 493-495. din. Psychol., 1970, 34, 450. 3. 4. 5. 6. DAHLSTROM, W. G. Personal communication, 1972. U E .~N , E. F. A lengthened Mini: the Midi-Mult. J. clin. Psychol., 1972, 28, 68-71. HARTFORD, T., LUBETKIN, B. and ALPKRT, G. Comparison of the standard MMPI and the Mini-Mult in a psychiatric outpatient clinic. J . consult. din. Psychol., 1972, 39, 243-245. HARTMAN, G. and XOBERTSON, M. Comparison of the Mini-Mult and the MMPI in a community mental health agency. Proceedings of the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972, 7 , Sd-34. Objective configural rules for discriminating MMPI profiles in a psychiatric population. J . d i n . Psychol., 1964, 20, 157-159. KINCANNON, J. C. Prediction of the standard MMPI scale scores from 71 items: the Mini-Mult.