2019
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation5010025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Control Alternative for the Hidden Enemy in the Wine Cellar

Abstract: Brettanomyces bruxellensis has been described as the principal spoilage yeast in the winemaking industry. To avoid its growth, wine is supplemented with SO2, which has been questioned due to its potential harm to health. For this reason, studies are being focused on searching for, ideally, natural new antifungals. On the other hand, it is known that in wine production there are a variety of microorganisms, such as yeasts and bacteria, that are possible biological controls. Thus, it has been described that some… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(110 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This specie has been described as the principal spoilage yeast in the winemaking industry. From the enological point of view, B. bruxellensis is known for its high resistance to ethanol and ability to survive in low-nutrient, low-pH conditions, allowing for long-term proliferation in winemaking processes [102]. Using CRISPR-Cas9 in combination with gene transformation cassettes tailored for B. bruxellensis, the authors were able to delete SSU1 genes (conferring sulfite tolerance) and provide the means for targeted gene deletion in this species.…”
Section: Genetic Manipulation Of Non-saccharomyces Yeastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specie has been described as the principal spoilage yeast in the winemaking industry. From the enological point of view, B. bruxellensis is known for its high resistance to ethanol and ability to survive in low-nutrient, low-pH conditions, allowing for long-term proliferation in winemaking processes [102]. Using CRISPR-Cas9 in combination with gene transformation cassettes tailored for B. bruxellensis, the authors were able to delete SSU1 genes (conferring sulfite tolerance) and provide the means for targeted gene deletion in this species.…”
Section: Genetic Manipulation Of Non-saccharomyces Yeastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, vinifications have been performed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, current enology is strongly focused on non-Saccharomyces yeasts [5]. Species such as: Metschnikowia pulcherrima [6], Brettanomyces bruxellensis [7], Torulaspora delbrueckii [8], Aureobasidium pullulans [9], Hanseniaspora/ Kloeckera spp. [10], Candida stellata [11], Saccharomycodes ludwigii [12], Starmerella bacillaris [13], Schizosaccharomyces pombe [14], Zygosaccharomyces rouxii [15], Wickerhamomyces anomalus [16], Lachancea thermotolerans [17].…”
Section: Lachancea Thermotolerans and Hanseniaspora Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors, either biotic or abiotic, can affect the yeasts present during alcoholic fermentation, and thus, modify the fermentation performance and the production of bioactive compounds [ 1 , 2 ]. The microbial interactions and responses, such as the synthesis of antimicrobial compounds, competition for nutrients and yeast–yeast cell contact are the main biotic factors [ 3 , 4 ]. On the other hand, abiotic factors are defined as environmental aspects that affect the winemaking process, such as nutrients (sugar and nitrogen), temperature and pH, among others [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%